3D-Printed Window Frames With Integrated Thermal Break Lattices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional manufacturing methods for windows and doors, such as those using aluminum extrusions with thermal breaks, require numerous steps and expensive equipment, resulting in inefficiencies and high costs.

Innovation Solution

The use of additive manufacturing techniques, including 3D printing, selective laser sintering, and selective laser melting, to create architectural products with composite constructions that vary in material composition, density, and distribution, allowing for reduced production times and elimination of waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional manufacturing methods (pour-and-debridge or crimped polyamide) are used for aluminum extrusions with thermal breaks, then thermal insulation performance is achieved, but manufacturing complexity and production time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal insulation performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the frame structure and thermal break into a single monolithic component manufactured by additive manufacturing, eliminating the need for separate thermal break inserts and multiple assembly steps. The thermal insulation functionality is integrated directly into the printed lattice structure rather than being added as a separate component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the manufacturing method from traditional subtractive or assembly-based processes to additive manufacturing, fundamentally altering how the thermal break is created. The lattice structure parameters (cell size, wall thickness, orientation) are optimized to achieve thermal insulation while maintaining structural integrity in a single manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If traditional manufacturing methods with multiple operations are used, then thermal break functionality is achieved, but production time and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal break functionalityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The thermal break structure is pre-designed and pre-manufactured as an integrated lattice pattern within the frame itself during the additive manufacturing process, eliminating the need for subsequent assembly operations. The lattice geometry is predetermined to provide thermal insulation while being created in a single continuous manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the thermal break functionality from separate components and integrates it directly into the frame structure through additive manufacturing. The lattice pattern is built as an inherent part of the frame rather than being added as a separate insert, reducing the number of manufacturing operations required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Loss of substance

If additive manufacturing with lattice structures is used, then material waste is reduced and production efficiency improves, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial wasteVSAvoidlattice structure precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a lattice structure with controlled porosity to achieve thermal insulation while using minimal material. The porous lattice geometry provides thermal break functionality through its air-filled cells while maintaining structural strength, allowing efficient material utilization with reduced waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The lattice structure features varying local densities and cell sizes optimized for different functional requirements. Areas requiring higher strength have denser lattice patterns, while areas prioritizing thermal insulation have more open structures, allowing precise control of properties throughout the component without excessive material usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If monolithic additive manufacturing is used for window frames, then assembly efficiency improves and parts count reduces, but design flexibility and customization options may be limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly efficiencyVSAvoiddesign customization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The additive manufacturing process enables dynamic design optimization where the lattice structure parameters can be varied continuously throughout the component based on functional requirements. The monolithic structure can incorporate varying cell sizes, orientations, and material densities to optimize both assembly efficiency and design flexibility simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The monolithic lattice-structured frame performs multiple functions simultaneously: structural support, thermal insulation, and aesthetic appearance. The integrated design eliminates the need for separate components while maintaining all necessary functionalities, improving assembly efficiency without sacrificing design versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of high-performance windows with reduced lead times, decreased material waste, and improved assembly efficiency, while allowing for customization and flexibility in design and thermal insulation.

Implementation Method 1

an additive manufacturing system that deposits material in a layer by layer fashion to form the architectural manufacture

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effect3D Printing: 3D Printing

Implementation Method 2

selective laser sintering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective Laser Sintering: Selective Laser Sintering

Implementation Method 3

selective laser melting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective Laser Melting:

Data Source

PatentEP3294553B1Architectural manufactures, apparatus and methods using additive manufacturing techniques
Publication Date: 2024.10.02 ARCONIC TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • EP3294553B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3294553B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3294553B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

An apparatus, method and manufacture utilizes additive manufacturing techniques to produce architectural manufactures such as windows and doors. The manufactures may have a composite construction and may feature inclusions like metal plates and reinforcements. The model used for controlling the manufacturing process may be derived from digital scanning of the structure on which the manufacture is used. Optionally, a finite element analysis is used to test the model and alter it in response to stress and/or thermal requirements.