3D Workpiece Visualization for Accurate Conduit Bending

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The fabrication of workpieces, such as electrical metallic tubing (EMT) or conduit, is a labor-intensive process that requires manual linear measurements, bend angle calculations, and orientation determination, leading to time-consuming and error-prone results.

Innovation Solution

A visualization system that generates a three-dimensional model of the workpiece based on input measurements, automatically calculating bend angles and positions, and communicates instructions to connected tools for precise fabrication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual measurement and calculation methods are used for workpiece fabrication, then the process requires minimal equipment investment, but the labor intensity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical measurement and calculation with an automated visualization system that uses computing devices to generate three-dimensional models and calculate fabrication parameters automatically. This substitution of mechanical human operations with computational systems directly addresses the contradiction by improving productivity while accepting increased device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The visualization system enables the workpiece fabrication process to be self-sufficient by automatically generating three-dimensional models, calculating bend angles, and determining orientations without requiring manual intervention for each measurement and calculation step. This self-service capability improves productivity by eliminating repetitive manual tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If manual measurement and calculation are used, then the equipment cost is low, but the error rate in fabrication increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces error-prone manual measurement and calculation with automated computational methods that generate precise three-dimensional models and fabrication parameters. This substitution eliminates human error in measurements and calculations, significantly improving manufacturing precision while requiring a more complex visualization system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The visualization system provides feedback by generating three-dimensional models that allow users to review and verify fabrication parameters before actual fabrication begins. This feedback mechanism enables error detection and correction in the digital model stage, ensuring high manufacturing precision in the physical workpiece.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If traditional fabrication methods are used, then the process is simple to operate, but the time required for measurement and calculation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement and calculation timeVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The visualization system performs preliminary actions by generating complete three-dimensional models and calculating all fabrication parameters before the actual fabrication process begins. This preliminary computational work eliminates the need for time-consuming manual measurements and calculations during fabrication, significantly reducing time loss while requiring users to operate the visualization system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces time-consuming manual measurement and calculation operations with automated computational processes that instantly generate fabrication parameters. This substitution dramatically reduces the time required for measurement and calculation tasks, though it requires users to learn and operate the visualization system interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If automated visualization systems are implemented, then productivity and precision improve, but the device complexity and initial investment increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated visualization systems that replace manual fabrication processes with computational methods, generating three-dimensional models and fabrication parameters automatically. This substitution improves fabrication reliability by eliminating human error while accepting increased device complexity in the form of computing devices and software interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The visualization system enhances reliability by providing feedback through three-dimensional model generation that allows verification of fabrication parameters before actual fabrication. This feedback loop ensures that errors are detected and corrected in the digital stage, improving overall fabrication reliability despite the increased system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250244742A1Workpiece visualization systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP
  • US20250244742A1 patent drawing
  • US20250244742A1 patent drawing
  • US20250244742A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of manufacturing a workpiece can include building a three-dimensional model of a workpiece within a visualization system stored on computing device, inputting measurement data into the visualization system corresponding to predetermined segments of the workpiece, updating the three-dimensional model based on the inputted measurement data to generate a updated three-dimensional model, and based on the inputted measurement data, manufacturing the workpiece to match the updated three-dimensional model.