3T DRAM Cell Architecture Without 3D Capacitors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dynamic random access memory cells face challenges in reducing area usage and process complexity due to the need for three-dimensional capacitors and destructive read/write operations, which hinder their integration in system-on-chip applications.

Innovation Solution

A three-transistor dynamic random access memory cell architecture that eliminates the need for a three-dimensional capacitor, using a write transistor, read transistor, and storage transistor with shared bit lines and a complementary field-effect transistor configuration to reduce area and maintain non-destructive read operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If three-dimensional capacitors are used in dynamic random access memory cells, then storage capacity is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the three-dimensional capacitor component from the memory cell architecture. By using a different mechanism (floating diffusion region with read transistor) to store and retrieve data, the complex 3D capacitor structure is removed entirely, simplifying the device while maintaining storage functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the complex, expensive three-dimensional capacitor with a simpler, easier-to-manufacture floating diffusion region. This substitution uses standard semiconductor fabrication processes without requiring complex 3D stacking, thereby reducing manufacturing cost and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Quantity of substance

If three-dimensional capacitors are used in dynamic random access memory cells, then storage capacity is improved, but manufacturing process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the three-dimensional capacitor from the manufacturing process entirely. The data storage function is achieved through a floating diffusion region that can be formed using standard planar fabrication processes, eliminating the need for complex 3D capacitor manufacturing steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental approach to data storage from physical 3D capacitor structures to electrical charge storage in a floating diffusion region. This parameter change allows using conventional fabrication processes rather than complex 3D stacking processes, simplifying manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If conventional dynamic random access memory cells are used, then area usage is reduced, but integration in system-on-chip applications is hindered due to process complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearea usageVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the problematic three-dimensional capacitor component that causes process complexity. By using a floating diffusion region with read and write transistors, the memory cell achieves compact area while being compatible with standard semiconductor fabrication processes suitable for system-on-chip integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a memory cell architecture that serves multiple functions: data storage, non-destructive read operation, and compact integration. The floating diffusion region acts as both the storage node and the interface for read/write operations, reducing the number of separate components needed and simplifying integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Area of stationary object

If three-transistor configuration with shared bit lines is used, then area requirements are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearea requirementsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the read and write operations through shared bit lines. The same bit line infrastructure is used for both reading and writing data, reducing the number of separate interconnect structures needed and thereby reducing area requirements while maintaining functionality through careful circuit design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution allows for high-density integration with access speeds comparable to SRAM cells while reducing production costs and area requirements, enabling integration in system-on-chip applications.

Implementation Method 1

complementary field-effect transistor configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectField-effect: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS20240257866A1Memory devices and methods of manufacturing and operating thereof
Publication Date: 2024.08.01 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US20240257866A1 patent drawing
  • US20240257866A1 patent drawing
  • US20240257866A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor device includes a memory cell including a first transistor, a second transistor, and a third transistor. The first transistor has a first gate terminal and the second transistor has a second gate terminal, the first gate terminal and the second gate terminal being connected to a first word line and a second word line, respectively. The first transistor has a pair of first source/drain terminals and the second transistor has a pair of second source/drain terminals, one of the pair of first source/drain terminals and one of the pair of second source/drain terminals being connected to a common bit line. The third transistor has a third gate terminal connected to the other of the pair of first source/drain terminals, and a pair of third source/drain terminals connected to the other of the pair of second source/drain terminals and a supply voltage, respectively.