5G Access Barring via Implicit Indexing for IoT Scalability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 5G communication systems face challenges in effectively managing access control and configuring network connections for a diverse range of wireless communication devices, particularly in IoT environments, where traditional identifiers may not suffice due to the increased number of devices and the need for larger identifier spaces.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for user equipment (UE) to receive system information from a base station, including barring information sets and access category-specific configurations, allowing it to determine whether to perform access barring checks based on implicit or explicit barring lists, and allowing access without checks when no corresponding barring configuration information is found.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional access control methods are used in 5G systems, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but the system cannot effectively support a large number of wireless communication devices and larger identifier spaces required for IoT environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport for large number of devicesVSAvoidaccess control mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The access control mechanism is segmented into multiple components: system information blocks carrying barring information, access category definitions, implicit barring lists with indices, and explicit barring lists. This segmentation allows the system to handle large numbers of devices by organizing access control data in structured, manageable units that can be efficiently processed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of access control by implementing implicit barring lists that reference indices rather than explicit device lists. This dimensional shift from direct device identification to index-based referencing enables scalable support for large device populations without proportionally increasing control message size

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If access barring checks are performed for all devices, then access control reliability is improved, but network access efficiency and productivity deteriorate due to increased checking overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control reliabilityVSAvoidnetwork access efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs access barring checks selectively rather than universally. Devices only perform barring checks when their access category matches an entry in the implicit barring list. For devices not listed or with non-matching categories, access proceeds without checking overhead, maintaining both reliability for controlled devices and efficiency for others

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

Each user equipment autonomously determines whether to perform access barring checks by comparing its access category against the received implicit barring list and system information. This self-service approach eliminates the need for centralized checking decisions, reducing signaling overhead and improving access efficiency while maintaining control reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If implicit barring lists with indices are used, then the system scalability and support for more devices is improved, but the complexity of managing and synchronizing barring information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem scalabilityVSAvoidbarring information management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implicit barring list with indices serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides device identification, defines access categories, and enables efficient matching against system information. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate management mechanisms, offsetting the complexity of index management with operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The network pre-configures and broadcasts the implicit barring list with indices in system information blocks before devices attempt access. This preliminary action allows devices to autonomously perform matching without real-time negotiation, reducing the complexity of dynamic management while maintaining scalability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3824693B1Network access barring method and terminal
Publication Date: 2024.04.03 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • EP3824693B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3824693B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3824693B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

Provided is a method, performed by a user equipment (UE), of controlling an access, the method including receiving, through system information from a base station, barring information including a barring configuration information list and a public land mobile network (PLMN)-specific barring information list, the barring configuration information list including at least one barring configuration information and the PLMN-specific barring information list including at least one barring information per PLMN and performing a barring check based on the received barring information when the access is triggered, in which the barring configuration information corresponds to one barring configuration information index according to an order of being included to the barring configuration information list.