5G Network Function Placement Across Specialized Compute Instances

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computing systems in 5G networks are often configured monolithically, leading to inefficient use of computational resources, increased costs, and decreased network quality due to the lack of intelligent resource allocation.

Innovation Solution

A computing system with separate compute instances configured for processor-heavy and high-throughput tasks, dynamically scaling network functions based on demand, allowing for optimized resource allocation and improved performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If computing resources are configured in a monolithic way, then system simplicity is maintained, but computational resource efficiency decreases and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational resource efficiencyVSAvoidcomputing system configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments computing resources into different compute instances with specialized configurations (e.g., compute instances optimized for processor-heavy network functions versus those optimized for high-throughput functions). This segmentation allows each compute instance to be tailored to specific workload requirements, improving overall computational resource efficiency while maintaining manageable system complexity through standardized segmentation categories.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If computing resources are configured in a monolithic way, then deployment simplicity is maintained, but network quality decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork qualityVSAvoidcomputing system architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by configuring different compute instances with locally optimized properties matched to specific network function requirements. For example, compute instances are configured with specific CPU, memory, or storage characteristics depending on the particular network function being executed, ensuring that each local component operates at optimal performance for its intended purpose while contributing to overall network quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If compute instances are specialized for specific functions, then functional performance is improved, but system flexibility decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork function execution performanceVSAvoidsystem adaptability to different network functions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by enabling the system to dynamically select and scale appropriate compute instances based on current network demands. The system can dynamically allocate specialized compute instances to specific network functions as needed, allowing the architecture to adapt to varying workloads while maintaining high performance through specialized hardware configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves universality by creating a multi-functional computing platform that can support multiple types of network functions through standardized interfaces and protocols. While individual compute instances are specialized, the overall system can accommodate diverse network functions (processor-heavy, high-throughput, memory-intensive) by deploying appropriate compute instance types, thus maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If network functions are dynamically scaled, then resource allocation efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback mechanisms that enable the system to monitor network function performance and demand in real-time, automatically adjusting compute instance allocation accordingly. This feedback-driven dynamic scaling improves resource allocation efficiency by ensuring compute resources are allocated based on actual usage patterns while reducing manual management complexity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260081825A1High efficiency and on demand computational environments for 5g network functions
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 BOOST SUBSCRIBERCO LLC
  • US20260081825A1 patent drawing
  • US20260081825A1 patent drawing
  • US20260081825A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed technology includes determining, based at least in part on a first set of properties, a first group of network functions; determining, based at least in part on the second set of properties, a second group of network functions; instantiating the first group of network functions on one or more of compute instances of a first set of compute instances, the first set of compute instances characterized at least in part by the first set of properties; instantiating the second group of network functions on one or more of the compute instances of a second set of compute instances, the second set of compute instances characterized at least in part by the second set of properties; and providing 5G cellular service to a user equipment using at least some of the first group of network functions and the second group of network functions.