5G NR Channel Configuration for Irregular Bandwidth Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The 5G New Radio (NR) radio access technology supports standard channel bandwidths, but regulators and network operators often allocate RF spectrum in irregular sizes that do not align with these standards, leading to challenges in channel configuration and interference.

Innovation Solution

User equipment (UE) indicates its filtering capability to the network, which configures channels to either the next higher or lower standard channel size to accommodate irregular bandwidths, ensuring effective filtering and minimizing interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the network allocates RF spectrum in irregular sizes, then spectrum utilization flexibility is improved, but channel configuration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectrum utilization flexibilityVSAvoidchannel configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the channel bandwidth parameter to accommodate irregular spectrum allocations. When a UE indicates it cannot filter irregular bandwidths, the network configures the channel bandwidth to the next higher standard size, allowing the UE to handle irregular allocations through parameter adjustment rather than complex filtering operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the channel configuration process into standard bandwidth parts. By configuring UEs with standard channel bandwidths (5MHz, 10MHz, 15MHz, etc.) and using blocking signals to indicate unavailable portions, the system divides irregular spectrum allocations into manageable standard segments that UEs can process independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If the network configures channel bandwidth greater than allocation bandwidth, then UE compatibility is improved, but interference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE compatibilityVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The blocking signal acts as an intermediary mechanism between the network and UE. It conveys information about unavailable spectrum portions to UEs, enabling them to adjust their reception parameters and avoid interfering with or being interfered by adjacent channels, thus resolving the compatibility-interference contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The network performs preliminary configuration by setting the channel bandwidth to the next higher standard size before actual communication begins. This preliminary action ensures UE compatibility with irregular allocations while the blocking signal is subsequently applied to prevent interference, as the UE is already configured to handle the broader bandwidth range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the network configures channel bandwidth less than allocation bandwidth, then interference is reduced, but spectrum utilization efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidspectrum utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by configuring UEs with standard bandwidths that may be larger than the actual allocated bandwidth. This excessive action (using larger standard bandwidths) ensures compatibility and simplifies UE processing, while the blocking signal mechanism ensures that only the necessary portion of the bandwidth is actively used, maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Adaptability or versatility

If UEs implement filtering capability for irregular bandwidths, then spectrum utilization flexibility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectrum utilization flexibilityVSAvoidfiltering capability complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables UEs to self-configure based on their filtering capabilities. When a UE indicates it cannot filter irregular bandwidths, the network automatically adjusts the channel bandwidth configuration accordingly. This self-service approach allows spectrum flexibility without requiring all UEs to implement complex filtering capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12355708B2Systems and methods for supporting irregular bandwidth channels
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 APPLE INC
  • US12355708B2 patent drawing
  • US12355708B2 patent drawing
  • US12355708B2 patent drawing

AI summary

User equipment that is capable of filtering for an irregular bandwidth of an allocated channel may send an indication of this capability to a network, which may then configure the channel to a next higher standard channel size, enabling the user equipment to filter this larger channel bandwidth to the irregular bandwidth. User equipment that is not capable of filtering for the irregular bandwidth may send an indication that it does not have this capability to the network, which may then configure the channel to a next lower standard channel size, thus avoiding the need for the user equipment to filter a larger channel bandwidth to the irregular bandwidth. In cases where the network detects that a blocking signal is not present that may interfere with the allocated channel, the network may configure the channel to the next higher standard channel size.