5T SRAM Cell Voltage Control for Stability and Power

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional 5T SRAM circuits suffer from read instability, low writeability, and larger layout size due to process variation and unbalanced transistor sizing, which affects stability and writability, especially in deep submicron technologies.

Innovation Solution

The proposed 5T SRAM architecture features balanced transistor sizing, a single access transistor, and control logic to adjust cell voltage during write operations, reducing cell voltage and increasing access transistor size, thereby improving writeability and stability while maintaining a smaller layout size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional 6T SRAM architecture is used, then read stability is maintained, but power consumption increases and layout size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveread stabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes one access transistor from the conventional 6T SRAM structure to create a 5T SRAM cell. This extraction of the redundant access transistor reduces the transistor count from six to five, thereby reducing static power consumption while maintaining read stability through the single access transistor's optimized design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the threshold voltage parameter of the single access transistor to optimize its behavior. By adjusting the threshold voltage, the access transistor achieves proper switching characteristics that maintain read stability while enabling lower power consumption compared to the conventional 6T structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional 6T SRAM architecture is used, then read stability is maintained, but layout size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveread stabilityVSAvoidlayout size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes one access transistor from the conventional 6T SRAM structure, reducing the transistor count from six to five. This reduction directly decreases the layout area while maintaining read stability through the optimized single access transistor design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the functions of two access transistors into a single access transistor by utilizing the complementary bit line structure. This merging reduces the number of components and simplifies the layout while maintaining the necessary read stability through proper transistor sizing and threshold voltage optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Use of energy by moving object

If 5T SRAM architecture is used, then power consumption is reduced, but read stability deteriorates due to process variation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidread stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the threshold voltage parameter of the single access transistor to compensate for process variations. By carefully selecting and adjusting the threshold voltage, the access transistor maintains stable reading operation across different process conditions while preserving the power savings of the 5T architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic transistor sizing and threshold voltage adjustment to adapt the access transistor's behavior to process variations. This dynamic optimization ensures read stability across different manufacturing conditions while maintaining the lower power consumption characteristic of the 5T structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If access transistor size is increased, then writeability is improved, but layout size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovewriteabilityVSAvoidlayout size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the width-to-length ratio parameter of the single access transistor to achieve proper writeability. By adjusting this geometric parameter, the access transistor gains sufficient drive strength for writing operations without requiring a proportional increase in overall cell area, thus improving writeability while minimizing layout size expansion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2550659B1Low-power 5t SRAM with improved stability and reduced bitcell size
Publication Date: 2020.01.15 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP2550659B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2550659B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2550659B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A 5 Transistor Static Random Access Memory (5T SRAM) is designed for reduced cell size and immunity to process variation. The 5T SRAM (400) includes a storage element (402) for storing data, wherein the storage element is coupled a first voltage and a ground voltage. The storage element can include symmetrically sized cross - coupled inverters. A single access transistor (M5 ) controls read and write operations on the storage element (402). Control logic (M6,M6') is configured to generate a value of the first voltage for a write operation that is different from the value of the first voltage for a read operation.