A/B Testing Subgroup Analysis for Minority Conversion Outcomes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current A/B testing methods often overlook the preferences of minority user segments and suffer from reduced statistical validity due to small sample sizes and flawed hypothesis testing, leading to inefficient and resource-intensive manual adjustments.

Innovation Solution

An A/B testing software suite that identifies minority subgroups with lower-than-expected conversion rates and automatically redesigns tests to account for their preferences, using lattice-based clustering and federated learning to improve stratified randomization and reduce resource consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional A/B testing methods are used to test user experience across the entire population, then the average conversion goal is measured, but minority user segments are overlooked and their preferences are not captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of A/B testingVSAvoidpreferences of minority user segments
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the population into strata based on feature values (e.g., demographics, behavior patterns). This allows the testing system to separately analyze and capture preferences of minority segments that would be obscured in aggregate population testing, while maintaining overall testing efficiency through automated stratification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of information

If manual adjustments are made to account for minority segments in A/B testing, then preferences of minority users can be captured, but the process becomes resource-intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreferences of minority user segmentsVSAvoidtime and resources for manual adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically identifying minority segments, creating strata, and adjusting test designs without human intervention. The automated system performs what would traditionally require manual analysis and adjustment, thereby capturing minority preferences while eliminating the associated time and resource costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-identifying and stratifying population segments before conducting A/B tests. This upfront automation of segmentation allows the system to proactively account for minority segments in the test design phase, avoiding the need for reactive manual adjustments after testing begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If the population is divided into many strata to capture minority segments, then segmentation precision improves, but sample sizes in each stratum become small reducing statistical validity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of segmentationVSAvoidstatistical validity of A/B testing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the granularity of stratification based on segment size and statistical power considerations. The system can modify strata definitions, combine small segments, or adjust significance thresholds to maintain statistical validity while preserving the ability to detect meaningful differences in minority segment preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If traditional A/B testing is performed without stratification, then the process is simple and fast, but heterogeneous outcomes across different user segments are not identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of A/B testingVSAvoidheterogeneous outcomes across strata
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation to divide the population into strata based on relevant features, enabling the system to identify heterogeneous outcomes across different user segments. This segmentation is performed automatically and efficiently, preserving the speed of traditional A/B testing while adding the capability to detect segment-specific effects that would be invisible in aggregate analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12387235B2Subgroup analysis in A/B testing
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12387235B2 patent drawing
  • US12387235B2 patent drawing
  • US12387235B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are techniques for A/B testing including a computer-implemented method of identifying, in an A/B testing database, a set of feature values with a statistically significant difference in A/B testing outcomes above a threshold. The method further includes partitioning records in the A/B testing database into a plurality of population strata according to the set of feature values. The method further includes performing A/B testing, and identifying heterogeneous outcomes of the A/B testing for respective strata of the plurality of population strata.