Patient-Specific Abdominal Model for Laparoscopic Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack the ability to effectively assess the physical changes in an abdomen after a laparoscopic surgical procedure, particularly the performance of surgical implants, in a patient-specific environment, which can lead to uncertainties in surgical outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A physical abdominal surgical simulation system that includes a patient-specific abdominal model with biomechanical properties, an image acquisition and analysis system, and a method to compare the changes between inflated and deflated states of the abdominal model during a simulated laparoscopic procedure, allowing clinicians to evaluate surgical implants and techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the abdominal wall is inflated during laparoscopic surgical procedure, then the workspace is created and abdominal viscera are separated from the abdominal wall, but physical changes occur after deflation that can affect surgical outcomes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabdominal cavity volumeVSAvoidsurgical outcome consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures images and data of the surgical site during the inflated state (while the workspace exists) and then again after deflation, allowing clinicians to assess and plan for physical changes before they occur in the actual patient. This preliminary assessment enables proactive adjustment of surgical plans to account for post-deflation changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides visual feedback by comparing images taken during inflation versus deflation, showing clinicians the actual physical changes that occur. This feedback loop allows for evaluation of how surgical implants and repairs perform under different abdominal pressure conditions, improving reliability of surgical outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Shape

If surgical implants are secured to the abdominal wall during inflated state, then the mesh or patch conforms to the abdominal wall, but the physical configuration changes after deflation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemesh conformity to abdominal wallVSAvoidimplant configuration stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures the configuration of surgical implants during the inflated state when the mesh is secured to the abdominal wall, and then captures post-deflation configuration. This allows clinicians to predict and plan for configuration changes before they occur, enabling better implant selection and placement strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

By providing visual comparison of implant configuration before and after deflation, the system gives clinicians feedback on how the mesh and repairs respond to abdominal pressure changes. This enables evaluation of implant performance and stability under different physiological conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If a physical abdominal model is used to simulate surgical procedures, then patient-specific environment assessment is enabled, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient-specific assessment accuracyVSAvoidsimulation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a physical abdominal model that replicates patient-specific anatomy and tissue properties, creating a realistic copy of the patient's abdominal cavity. This allows clinicians to practice and assess surgical plans in a patient-specific environment without the risks associated with actual surgery, improving measurement precision while keeping the model manageable in complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances clinicians' understanding of physical changes post-surgery, enabling better evaluation of surgical performance and revision of surgical plans to reduce the likelihood of procedural failures.

Implementation Method 1

a physical abdominal model with biomechanical properties, an image acquisition and analysis system, and a method to compare the changes between inflated and deflated states of the abdominal model during a simulated laparoscopic procedure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInsufflation: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

The abdominal wall member may be deflated from the inflated state to a deflated state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeflation: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS10380922B2Abdominal model for laparoscopic abdominal wall repair/reconstruction simulation
Publication Date: 2019.08.13 SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS
  • US10380922B2 patent drawing
  • US10380922B2 patent drawing
  • US10380922B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A physical abdominal surgical simulation system including an abdominal model mimicking the biomechanical properties and response of a patient specific abdomen and an image acquisition and analysis system. The abdominal model includes an abdominal wall model insert forming a frame of the abdominal model, an abdominal wall member secured to the abdominal wall model insert, a back member secured to the abdominal wall model insert in opposed relation with respect to the abdominal wall member, and an abdominal model cavity defined within abdominal wall model insert, the abdominal wall member, and the back member. The image acquisition and analysis system includes a plurality of cameras configured to capture images of the abdominal model cavity.