Ablation Volume Determination via Cross-Sectional Slicing
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional methods for determining the volume of ablation lesions during electrosurgical procedures provide inexact, inconsistent, and inaccurate measurements, lacking evaluative tools to assess the effect of adjacent structures and predict specific volumes and shapes based on energy applicator configurations.
Innovation Solution
A method and system that involve supplying energy to tissue, simulating slicing of the tissue perpendicular to a defined axis to obtain simulated slices, calculating the volume of each slice based on its thickness and cross-sectional perimeter, and summing these volumes to determine the ablation volume, using electrosurgical generators and imaging feedback for precise geometric reconstruction.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If conventional methods (recording small diameter, large diameter, and height) are used to calculate ablation volume, then the measurement process is simple, but the measurement precision and reliability are poor
Solution Approach 1:
The patent divides the ablation volume into multiple cross-sectional slices perpendicular to a defined axis. Each slice is analyzed separately to determine its area, and the volumes of all slices are summed to obtain the total ablation volume. This segmentation approach transforms a complex 3D measurement problem into a series of manageable 2D area measurements, significantly improving measurement precision while maintaining systematic complexity at an acceptable level.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces a new dimensional approach by defining an axis through the ablation volume and creating cross-sectional slices perpendicular to this axis. This transforms the traditional 1D linear measurements (diameter and height) into a 2D cross-sectional area measurement approach, enabling more accurate volumetric calculation by capturing the true geometry of the ablation lesion in multiple planes.
2Manufacturing precision
If conventional ellipsoidal volume calculation is used, then the calculation process is quick, but the manufacturing precision and consistency of volume determination are inaccurate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent performs preliminary actions by defining the axis and creating the cross-sectional slice framework before actual volume measurement. This pre-establishment of the measurement geometry allows for consistent and accurate slicing throughout the ablation volume, improving manufacturing precision. The automated nature of this preliminary setup minimizes the time loss, as the framework is established once and then used for systematic volume calculation.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces the mechanical assumption of ellipsoidal shape with a computational slicing method. Instead of forcing the ablation volume into a predefined geometric model (ellipsoid), the system uses computational geometry to directly measure the actual cross-sectional areas and sum their volumes. This substitution of mechanical modeling with computational measurement achieves higher accuracy without significant time penalty, as modern computing can rapidly process the slice data.
3Adaptability or versatility
If conventional measurement methods are used, then the operation is straightforward, but the ability to evaluate adjacent structures and predict volumes based on applicator configuration is insufficient
Solution Approach 1:
The patent incorporates imaging feedback to visualize and analyze the cross-sectional slices of the ablation volume. This feedback mechanism allows the system to evaluate the relationship between the ablation lesion and adjacent structures, assess the completeness of ablation, and predict volumes based on applicator configuration. The imaging feedback transforms the system from simple measurement to intelligent evaluation, enhancing adaptability while the automated analysis keeps complexity manageable.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates a multi-functional system that not only measures ablation volume but also evaluates adjacent structures, assesses ablation completeness, and predicts volumes based on applicator configuration. By integrating these multiple functions into a single cross-sectional slicing framework, the system achieves high adaptability and versatility without proportionally increasing complexity, as the same core methodology serves multiple evaluative purposes.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This approach enables accurate and consistent determination of ablation volumes, allowing for assessment of completeness and impact from adjacent structures, improving prediction and consistency of ablation results based on energy applicator configurations.
Implementation Method 1
In monopolar electrosurgery, a source or active electrode delivers radio frequency energy from the electrosurgical generator to the tissue
Implementation Method 2
high radio frequency electrical current is applied to a targeted tissue site to create an ablation volume
Implementation Method 3
A CT scanner 112 is provided for imaging tissue to create one or more images corresponding to the ablation volume and the electrode within the tissue
Data Source
AI summary
A method for determining a volume of ablated tissue includes the steps of supplying energy to tissue, indicating an axis within the tissue, and simulating slicing of the tissue substantially perpendicular to the axis to obtain a plurality of simulated slices. Each of the plurality of simulated slices has a thickness, a cross-sectional perimeter, and a trajectory point defined by the axis within the tissue. The method further includes the steps of determining a volume of each of the plurality of simulated slices based on the trajectory point, the cross-sectional perimeter, and the thickness of each simulated slice, and summing the volumes from each of the plurality of simulated slices to obtain the volume of the ablated tissue.


