Abnormality Detection Model Segmentation for Failure and Aging Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting abnormalities in plant systems, such as chemical or oil refinery plants, cannot distinguish between failures and aged deterioration, leading to unclear maintenance intervals and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that generates a comparison model when an abnormality is detected, allowing for the determination of whether the abnormality is caused by a failure or aged deterioration by comparing the relationship among metrics indicated by both models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If invariant relation analysis is used to detect system abnormalities, then abnormality detection capability is improved, but the ability to distinguish between failure and aged deterioration deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabnormality detection capabilityVSAvoidcause identification information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the abnormality analysis into two distinct parts: (1) detection of abnormality using invariant relation analysis, and (2) classification of abnormality cause by comparing metric distribution patterns. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high abnormality detection capability while adding cause identification without compromising the original detection function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces metric distribution patterns as an intermediary element between abnormality detection and cause identification. By analyzing the distribution characteristics of metrics (normal vs. abnormal states), the system can determine whether an abnormality is caused by failure or aged deterioration, thus recovering the lost cause identification information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If maintenance intervals are determined by empirical rules, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision of maintenance timing deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance scheduling simplicityVSAvoidmaintenance timing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service maintenance scheduling by automatically analyzing metric distributions and determining whether abnormalities indicate failure or aged deterioration. This eliminates the need for manual empirical judgment while providing precise, data-driven maintenance timing recommendations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring metric distributions and using the results to adjust maintenance timing. The system provides feedback on the actual system state (failure vs. aged deterioration) which informs optimal maintenance scheduling, thereby improving maintenance timing accuracy while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10747188B2Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and, recording medium
Publication Date: 2020.08.18 NEC CORP
  • US10747188B2 patent drawing
  • US10747188B2 patent drawing
  • US10747188B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An abnormality of a system is caused by a failure or aged deterioration is determined. A monitoring apparatus includes a model storage unit, a model generation unit, and a determination unit. The model storage unit stores a monitoring model that is a model for one point in time. The model indicates a relationship among a plurality of metrics of a system. The model generation unit generates a comparison model that is the model for a point in time at which the relationship among the plurality of metrics does not conform to the monitoring model. The determination unit determines that the relationship among metrics in the system has changed in a case where the comparison model indicates the relationship among metrics among which the monitoring model indicates the relationship, and outputs a result of the determination.