Above-Water Propulsion Hull for Shallow Obstacle Navigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Structures near water bodies are prone to degradation due to moisture and vegetation ingress, which can lead to structural integrity issues and damage from freeze-thaw cycles, exacerbated by limited personnel access and obstacles that can harm propulsion systems of traditional remotely controlled vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A remotely controlled boat-drone hybrid with a buoyant hull and propulsion system located above the water, featuring a planar base and rotatable turbomachines for maneuverability, enabling navigation around obstacles and eliminating the need for human access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a traditional remotely controlled vehicle is used to access water, then inspection and repair work can be conducted, but personnel accessibility is required which exposes personnel to risk and is limited by steep banks and overgrown vegetation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonnel accessibilityVSAvoidpersonnel safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device is equipped with an integrated propulsion system that enables it to navigate, inspect, and perform repair tasks autonomously without requiring human personnel to physically access the water body, thereby eliminating safety risks while maintaining operational capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The device combines inspection, repair, and navigation functions in a single autonomous platform, allowing it to perform multiple tasks including navigating to structures, inspecting for vegetation ingress, and conducting repair work without requiring different specialized equipment or personnel

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Speed

If the propulsion system is located below the water, then the device can navigate efficiently, but obstacles within the water can cause damage to the propulsion system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation efficiencyVSAvoidpropulsion system durability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The propulsion system is extracted from the traditional submerged position and relocated to an above-water configuration, eliminating exposure to underwater obstacles while maintaining the ability to generate propulsive force for efficient navigation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The propulsion system operates in the air dimension rather than the water dimension, using aerial propellers to generate thrust that is transmitted to the device, thereby avoiding contact with underwater hazards while preserving navigation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Speed

If a non-planar base is used, then the device may have better hydrodynamics, but it increases the risk of grounding in shallow waters and reduces stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrodynamic performanceVSAvoidgrounding risk
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device employs a circular base geometry that provides uniform distribution of forces and consistent hydrodynamic characteristics in all directions, enhancing both stability on water and resistance to grounding while maintaining efficient movement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The propulsion system is configured with asymmetric propeller arrangement relative to the circular base, allowing optimized thrust distribution for directional control and maneuverability while the symmetric base provides stable support and grounding resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Device complexity

If the propulsion system can only move in fixed directions, then the device structure is simpler, but it reduces maneuverability for navigating around obstacles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropulsion system structureVSAvoidmaneuverability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The propulsion system incorporates rotatable propellers that can dynamically change their orientation and direction of thrust, enabling the device to navigate around obstacles and position itself precisely while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device utilizes a modular composite structure combining a simple circular base with dynamically adjustable propeller assemblies, achieving enhanced maneuverability through the integration of rotational mechanisms while keeping the base structure straightforward and easy to manufacture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device can navigate through shallow waters, avoid propulsion damage, and perform tasks like weed removal and inspection without human intervention, enhancing maneuverability and stability while reducing the risk of grounding.

Implementation Method 1

a buoyant hull having a substantially planar base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentEP4341156B1Improvements in or relating to a device for use on water
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 RAILSCAPE TECH LTD
  • EP4341156B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4341156B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4341156B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A device for use on water, the device comprising a hull (20) having a substantially planar base (30) and a propulsion system (40) configured to propel the device in any direction across a plane substantially parallel to the base, wherein the propulsion system is located above the water, in use.