Abrasive Grain Asymmetry for Backing Anchorage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing abrasive grains struggle with space-efficient arrangement on abrasive material backings and inadequate anchorage, leading to suboptimal chip formation and surface quality during grinding.

Innovation Solution

Design of abrasive grains with a first face lacking corners and a second face featuring corners, allowing secure anchorage and improved orientation on the backing for enhanced chip formation and material removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If abrasive grains with symmetric forms (e.g., equilateral triangle base) are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but orientation control on backing is poor leading to inconsistent grinding performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorientation control on backingVSAvoidgrain form complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by designing abrasive grains with a base area that is not equilateral (e.g., isosceles triangle or rectangle) and side faces with different inclination angles. This asymmetric geometry creates a preferred orientation when grains are scattered on the backing, with corners and vertices pointing in specific directions to optimize chip formation and material removal, while maintaining relatively simple manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Productivity

If traditional abrasive grain forms are used, then manufacturing process is simple, but space utilization on backing is inefficient reducing productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal rateVSAvoidgrain form complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric grain forms with specific base shapes (non-equilateral triangles, rectangles) and controlled side face inclinations optimize the packing density and spatial arrangement of grains on the backing. This improves space utilization and allows more active cutting edges to be engaged during grinding, increasing material removal rate without requiring complex manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Strength

If abrasive grains with corners on all faces are used, then cutting capability is enhanced, but anchorage on backing becomes inadequate leading to grain detachment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanchorage strengthVSAvoidchip formation quality
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the characteristics of different grain surfaces: the base area has specific corner configurations for optimal anchorage in the binder, while the side faces have controlled inclinations and selective corner presence to maintain cutting capability. This localized optimization ensures both secure attachment and effective material removal without compromising either function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10557068B2Abrasive grain with main surfaces and subsidiary surfaces
Publication Date: 2020.02.11 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US10557068B2 patent drawing
  • US10557068B2 patent drawing
  • US10557068B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An abrasive grain includes a surface having at least a first face with a first outline, and at least one second face with a second outline. The first outline does not contain any vertices, but the second outline contains at least one vertex. The abrasive grain may include a ceramic material, especially polycrystalline α-Al2O3.