Multi-Directional Abrasive Protrusions for Dust-Resistant Grinding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Solid abrasive articles face issues with defects, reduced grinding performance due to abrasion dust accumulation, and inefficient coolant lubrication, leading to rapid reduction in abrasion performance and the need for repeated abrasion.

Innovation Solution

The development of an abrasive article with multi-directional abrasion protrusions, specifically tetrahedral in shape with three or four sides, integrated with a binding agent and additives, allowing for improved loading resistance and durability, and the grouping of protrusions to enhance grinding efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If abrasion protrusions are spaced apart to prevent dust accumulation, then dust accumulation is reduced, but grinding performance decreases due to reduced density

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabrasion dust accumulationVSAvoidgrinding performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from 2D planar spacing to 3D spatial arrangement by utilizing vertical height differences. Protrusions are positioned at different heights (first height h1 and second height h2) to create multi-level spacing that prevents dust accumulation while maintaining high surface density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The abrasive surface is segmented into multiple levels with protrusions at different heights. This segmentation creates distinct zones that facilitate dust removal while maintaining overall high density of abrasive elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If general abrasive articles are used with unidirectional rotation, then manufacturing is simple, but many spaces where abrasion is not performed are formed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidabrasion coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs asymmetric protrusion shapes (e.g., triangular, quadrangular, pentagonal, hexagonal) with specific orientation arrangements. These asymmetric geometries ensure that during rotation, all surfaces of the workpiece come into contact with abrasive protrusions, eliminating non-abraded spaces while maintaining manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses simple geometric protrusion shapes that are easy to manufacture but provide enhanced functionality through their arrangement and orientation, achieving complex multi-directional abrasion effects with simple structural elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If uniform constant-size abrasion protrusions are used, then manufacturing is easy, but attachment materials cannot be removed uniformly requiring repeated abrasion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotrusion manufacturingVSAvoiduniform abrasion removal
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality variation by positioning protrusions at different heights (h1 and h2) and using different shapes for different protrusions. This creates zones with different abrasive characteristics that enable uniform removal of attachment materials across the entire workpiece surface in a single operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes geometric parameters of protrusions (height, shape, orientation) to optimize abrasion performance. By varying these parameters across different protrusions, the system achieves comprehensive material removal without requiring repeated abrasion cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures efficient and even abrasion without attachment materials, increased grinding efficiency, and reduced abrasion time, achieving two times faster results compared to traditional methods while maintaining high performance without repeated abrasion cycles.

Implementation Method 1

abrasion performance is improved by providing various directional properties to an abrasion protrusion pattern

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentEP2656970B1Abrasive article having multi-directional abrasion protrusion
Publication Date: 2021.10.06 DEERFOS
  • EP2656970B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2656970B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP2656970B1 patent drawingFigure 2A

AI summary

An abrasive article having a multi-directional abrasion protrusion (120, 130, 220, 320, 330, 420, 520, 530, 620, 630) according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention includes a flexible base substrate (110, 210, 310, 410, 510, 610), and a plurality of abrasion protrusions integrally molded with the base substrate and having at least three sides forming a triangle, in which a plurality of abrasion protrusions has a directional property by grouping. According to this constitution, loading resistance and durability are excellent, there are no attachment materials attached to an abraded surface in the case where a flat surface is abraded, abrasion can be efficiently and evenly performed in a predetermined shape even though abrasion particles are not enlarged to perform abrasion or abrasion is not repeated several times by using particulates, and abrasion performance can be improved.