Abrasive Tool Dual-Layer Backing for Contoured Surface Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional abrasive tools require multiple passes and tools to achieve smooth machining of contoured surfaces, leading to inefficiencies, potential edge damage, and increased operational complexity, especially for untrained operators.

Innovation Solution

An abrasive tool with a dual-layer structure, where a less yielding second layer with higher stretch modulus supports an abrasive layer, allowing for optimal material removal while the more deformable first layer follows the surface profile, enabling single-pass machining without undulations and edge damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a hard or medium backing pad is used for initial machine roughing, then material removal efficiency is improved, but surface precision deteriorates due to formation of undulations and steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal efficiencyVSAvoidsurface precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The backing pad is segmented into multiple layers with different rigidity characteristics. The first layer (contacting workpiece) has lower rigidity to follow surface contours and prevent undulations, while the second layer (intermediate) has higher rigidity to support material removal. This segmentation allows each layer to perform its specific function optimally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The backing pad uses a composite structure combining materials of different rigidity. The first layer uses softer material (e.g., foam with lower density) to conform to contoured surfaces, while the second layer uses stiffer material (e.g., foam with higher density or rigid substrate) to provide structural support for effective abrasion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If a soft backing pad is used to avoid surface undulations, then surface precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to inadequate material removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface precisionVSAvoidmaterial removal efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The backing pad is divided into functional layers: the first layer (soft) contacts the workpiece to prevent undulations, while the second layer (rigid) provides the structural support needed for effective material removal. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by assigning different rigidity requirements to different layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The composite structure combines soft and rigid materials in a layered configuration, allowing the soft outer layer to ensure surface precision while the rigid inner layer maintains productivity through adequate material removal capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Manufacturing precision

If manual roughing with pre-shaped or flexible pads is performed, then surface precision is improved, but device complexity and execution time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface precisionVSAvoidtool variety
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The multi-layer backing pad design provides a universal solution that can be used for both machine roughing and finishing operations on contoured surfaces. A single tool design replaces the need for multiple specialized tools (pre-shaped pads, flexible pads, intermediate soft layers), simplifying the overall process while maintaining surface precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If conventional backing pads are used for contoured surfaces, then ease of operation is maintained, but harmful factors increase due to edge damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidedge damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The first layer of the backing pad has locally optimized properties (lower rigidity, higher conformity) specifically at the contact surface to follow contoured geometry and protect edges. This local quality adjustment prevents edge damage while maintaining ease of operation on complex surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient, single-pass surface machining without undulations, reduces operational complexity, and minimizes edge damage, regardless of operator experience, using a tool that can be easily set up and maintained.

Implementation Method 1

the first layer (4) is made of a material which is deformable as a function of stresses applied at right angles to the arrangement of such layer... the second layer (5) has a greater stretch modulus than that of the first layer (4) with respect to stresses which are substantially at right angles to the plane of arrangement of such layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3152002B1Abrasive tool for machining surfaces
Publication Date: 2021.02.24 BARATTI PAOLO
  • EP3152002B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3152002B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3152002B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

An abrasive tool (1) for machining surfaces, which comprises a support (2) associated with at least one abrasive layer (3), and a first layer (4) and a second layer (5), both of which are made of elastically deformable material and are interposed between said support (2) and said abrasive layer (3); the second layer (5) has a higher stretch modulus than the first layer (4) and is arranged in an intermediate position between the first layer (4) and the abrasive layer (3), and the first layer (4) is associated with the support (2).