Electromagnetic Wave Absorber Adhesive Layer Thickness for Stepped Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electromagnetic wave absorbers fail to effectively mount on surfaces with steps near millimeter-wave radars and do not detach properly upon impact, leading to potential distortion and reduced absorption performance.

Innovation Solution

An electromagnetic wave absorber with an adhesive layer that has a thickness equal to or greater than a reference height determined by subtracting 0.1 mm from the step height, ensuring a return loss of 15 dB or more, allowing it to adhere securely to surfaces with steps and maintain absorption performance even under impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the adhesive layer thickness is increased to accommodate surface steps, then the absorber can be securely mounted on stepped surfaces, but the absorption performance may deteriorate due to increased distortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting reliability on stepped surfacesVSAvoidabsorption performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the adhesive layer thickness parameter. The adhesive layer thickness is set to be 0.1 mm to 0.5 mm, which is a specific parameter range that balances two conflicting requirements: thick enough to accommodate surface steps for reliable mounting, but thin enough to minimize distortion and maintain absorption performance. This parameter optimization resolves the technical contradiction between mounting reliability and absorption performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If the adhesive layer is made thicker to cover step heights, then the absorber maintains contact with stepped surfaces, but the return loss increases reducing absorption efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact stability on stepped surfacesVSAvoidreturn loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction through parameter changes by optimizing the adhesive layer thickness parameter. By setting the thickness within 0.1 mm to 0.5 mm, the patent achieves sufficient contact stability on stepped surfaces while minimizing the increase in return loss. This parameter optimization ensures that the adhesive layer is thick enough to maintain contact but not so thick as to cause excessive energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional adhesive layers are used on stepped surfaces, then mounting is simple, but the absorber detaches upon impact reducing reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting simplicityVSAvoidimpact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the adhesive layer thickness parameter to resolve the contradiction between mounting simplicity and impact resistance. The thickness parameter of 0.1 mm to 0.5 mm provides sufficient adhesive mass and bonding area to maintain reliability under impact, while still allowing for simple mounting procedures. This parameter optimization ensures both ease of manufacture and high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The electromagnetic wave absorber exhibits good absorption performance on surfaces with steps and is less likely to detach upon impact, reducing stress and maintaining functionality.

Implementation Method 1

an adhesive layer that is disposed on at least one surface of the electromagnetic wave-absorbing layer, wherein the electromagnetic wave absorber is capable of being adhered to a surface having a step in such a manner that the adhesive layer is in contact with the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

an electromagnetic wave-absorbing layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDielectric loss: Dielectric

Implementation Method 3

Patent Literature 4 describes an electromagnetic wave absorption material having a magnetic layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic loss: Magnetism

Implementation Method 4

a return loss ΔR defined by the following equation is 15 dB or more: ΔR=Rt−Rr wherein: Rt is a reflection amount of a 76-GHz electromagnetic wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic wave absorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS11547031B2Electromagnetic wave absorber
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 NITTO DENKO CORP
  • US11547031B2 patent drawing
  • US11547031B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electromagnetic wave absorber includes an electromagnetic wave-absorbing layer (10) and an adhesive layer (20). The adhesive layer (20) is disposed on at least one surface of the electromagnetic wave-absorbing layer (10). The electromagnetic wave absorber is capable of being adhered to a surface having a step in such a manner that the adhesive layer (20) is in contact with the surface. The adhesive layer (20) has a thickness equal to or greater than a reference height determined by subtracting 0.1 mm from the height of the step. In the electromagnetic wave absorber, a return loss ΔR defined by ΔR=Rt−Rr is 15 dB or more. Rt is a reflection amount of a 76-GHz electromagnetic wave and is measured for a reference specimen. Rr is a reflection amount of a 76-GHz electromagnetic wave and is measured for a specimen obtained by adhering the electromagnetic wave absorber.