AC Electrolysis for Metal Nanoparticle Synthesis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for preparing metal nanoparticles are not environmentally friendly, require hazardous materials, and struggle with controlling particle size and yield, especially when producing nanoparticles for large-scale commercial applications.

Innovation Solution

A method using alternating current electrolysis where the concentrations of a reducing agent and a dispersing agent are maintained at constant levels in proportion to the intensity of the electric current, with the electrolyte solution containing a mixture of acidic and basic components at a pH of 7-9, and the frequency of alternating current power set between 0 and 10 Hz, to produce uniform metal nanoparticles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional electrolysis methods use metal salts as electrolytes, then metal particles can be obtained, but hazardous materials are generated and the environment is polluted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobtaining metal particlesVSAvoidhazardous materials and pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates hazardous metal salts from the electrolyte system, replacing them with non-hazardous alternatives. This removes the harmful factor while preserving the essential function of obtaining metal particles through electrolysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the previously harmful metal salt electrolytes into beneficial non-hazardous electrolytes. By changing the electrolyte composition, the process maintains particle production capability while eliminating environmental harm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Productivity

If conventional electrolysis methods increase temperature to improve reaction rate, then particle production increases, but hazardous gases are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle production rateVSAvoidhazardous gases
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the electrolyte composition parameters to enable efficient particle production at lower temperatures. This parameter modification allows maintaining productivity while avoiding the generation of hazardous gases that would occur at elevated temperatures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If conventional electrolysis methods use strong electrolytes to improve conductivity, then particle synthesis efficiency increases, but particle size uniformity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynthesis efficiencyVSAvoidparticle size uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes electrolyte parameters including concentration, composition, and pH to achieve a balance between conductivity for efficient synthesis and control for uniform particle size. This multi-parameter optimization resolves the contradiction between productivity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Stability of the object's composition

If conventional methods use surfactants and additives to prevent particle agglomeration, then particle stability improves, but environmental friendliness deteriorates due to hazardous materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle stabilityVSAvoidhazardous surfactants and additives
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs temporary, non-hazardous protective agents that can be easily removed or decomposed. These agents provide the necessary stability during synthesis but do not persist as harmful substances in the environment, unlike conventional surfactants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent removes or eliminates hazardous surfactants and additives from the process, replacing them with environmentally benign alternatives that achieve the same particle stabilization function without environmental harm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

5Length of moving object

If mechanical milling methods are used to obtain fine particles, then particle size can be reduced, but particle purity deteriorates due to contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle sizeVSAvoidparticle purity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical milling with electrolysis, a chemical/electrochemical process. This substitution eliminates the mechanical contamination inherent in ball milling and stamp milling while achieving fine particle production through controlled electrochemical reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in high-yield, uniformly sized metal nanoparticles with a narrow particle size distribution, suitable for large-scale production, and is environmentally friendly, making them suitable for applications such as conductive inks and medical devices.

Implementation Method 1

a method for preparing metal nanoparticles using electrolysis, the method including the steps of: dissolving an electrolyte and a dispersing agent in pure water in a reactor to prepare an electrolytic solution; placing first and second electrodes apart from each other in the electrolytic solution in the reactor, the electrodes being made of the same material as metal nanoparticles to be synthesized; applying alternating current at the first and second electrodes to ionize the metal of the first and second electrodes in the electrolytic solution; and introducing into the electrolytic solution a reducing agent according to the concentration of metal ions produced, thereby synthesizing metal nanoparticles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrolysis: Electrolysis

Implementation Method 2

introducing into the electrolytic solution a reducing agent according to the concentration of metal ions produced, thereby synthesizing metal nanoparticles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentEP2479140B1Method and apparatus for producing metal nanoparticles using alternating current electrolysis
Publication Date: 2016.01.06 AMOGREENTECH CO LTD
  • EP2479140B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2479140B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are a method and apparatus for preparing metal nanoparticles using alternating current (AC) electrolysis, in which the yield of metal nanoparticles obtained can be greatly improved by maintaining the concentrations of a reducing agent and a dispersing agent at constant levels in proportion to the intensity of an electric current during the production of the metal nanoparticles. The method for preparing metal nanoparticles comprises the steps of: dissolving an electrolyte and a dispersing agent in pure water in a reactor to prepare an electrolytic solution; placing first and second electrodes apart from each other in the electrolytic solution in the reactor, the electrodes being made of the same material as metal nanoparticles to be obtained; applying alternating current at the first and second electrodes to ionize the metal of the first and second electrodes in the electrolytic solution; and introducing into the electrolytic solution a reducing agent so as to maintain the reducing agent at a constant level according to the concentration of metal ions produced, thereby reducing the metal ions to obtain the metal nanoparticles.