Adaptive Cruise Control Extended Mode Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional adaptive cruise control (ACC) systems in heavy-duty vehicles shut off when set-speed cruise control (SSCC) is deactivated, leading to safety issues as they fail to recognize SSCC shutoff due to ACC deceleration events, causing unintended deactivation of ACC and loss of braking control.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive cruise control system that operates in an extended mode, allowing ACC to continue functioning even when SSCC is shut off, using a radar sensor and processor to maintain a predetermined distance from a forward vehicle and apply brakes as necessary, independent of SSCC activation, until an ACC shutoff trigger event is detected.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If ACC system shuts off when SSCC is deactivated, then system complexity is reduced, but safety and reliability deteriorate due to unintended deactivation during ACC-initiated deceleration events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cruise control system into two independent operational modes: SSCC (Set Speed Cruise Control) and ACC (Adaptive Cruise Control). The ACC system is designed to operate independently with its own activation and deactivation logic, rather than being strictly dependent on SSCC state. This segmentation allows ACC to maintain operation during SSCC deactivation when appropriate, resolving the contradiction by enabling ACC to distinguish between driver-initiated and ACC-initiated deceleration events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the ACC system monitors its own operational state and the reasons for SSCC deactivation. By detecting whether deceleration was ACC-initiated or driver-initiated, the system provides feedback to determine appropriate ACC behavior. This feedback loop prevents unintended ACC deactivation while maintaining system reliability and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If ACC operates independently of SSCC state, then safety and reliability improve, but device complexity increases due to extended operational modes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic operational characteristics where the ACC system can transition between different states based on real-time conditions. The ACC may operate in normal mode when SSCC is active, or in extended mode when SSCC is deactivated following ACC-initiated deceleration. This dynamic adaptability allows the system to improve safety without requiring completely separate independent systems, thereby limiting the increase in complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The ACC system is designed with multi-functionality to handle multiple operational scenarios: it can operate during SSCC active state, continue operation after SSCC deactivation (extended mode), and properly deactivate when appropriate. This universal design allows a single ACC system to fulfill multiple functions across different operational contexts, improving reliability without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If ACC continues operation after SSCC deactivation, then braking control and safety are maintained, but loss of time occurs during mode transitions and state management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking controlVSAvoidtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by having the ACC system proactively detect and record the reason for SSCC deactivation before ACC deactivation is considered. The system anticipates potential SSCC shutdown reasons (driver input, fault conditions, etc.) and pre-determines whether ACC should continue operation. This preliminary detection and state recording minimizes processing time during actual mode transitions and prevents time loss through reactive decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures continuous ACC operation during SSCC deactivation, enhancing safety by maintaining braking control and preventing sudden loss of braking force, even when SSCC is disengaged due to ACC-initiated deceleration events.

Implementation Method 1

a radar sensor that detects the position of a forward vehicle relative to a primary vehicle in which the sensor is installed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Data Source

PatentUS8688349B2ACC extended mode operation
Publication Date: 2014.04.01 GROLLE KENNETH A
  • US8688349B2 patent drawing
  • US8688349B2 patent drawing
  • US8688349B2 patent drawing

AI summary

When employing an a cruise control system in a commercial or heavy-duty vehicle, an adaptive cruise control (ACC) system (14) is activated upon activation of a vehicle or set-speed cruise control (SSCC) system (16). The ACC (14) remains on, even after SSCC shutoff, to maintain a minimum following distance for a primary vehicle in which the ACC (14) is employed and a forward vehicle. The ACC (14) is deactivated after detection of an ACC shutoff trigger event, which may be driver application of the brakes of the primary vehicle, driver-initiated acceleration for a predefined time period, expiration of a predetermined time period, manual shutoff (e.g., via a switch or button), etc.