AccAD Network Routing Optimization via Cost-Based Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network traffic optimization methods, such as finding shortest paths and using data compression and caching, are not optimal for full network resource utilization, leading to underperforming network services and inefficient resource usage across sub-optimal routes, increasing the total cost of ownership.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an accelerated application delivery (AccAD) network that calculates direct connection costs considering various network parameters, uses a minimum cost threshold to determine optimal routing, and dynamically adjusts network services by associating client and server front ends with nodes that can switch roles, allowing for automatic discovery and acceleration of network links to maximize resource utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If shortest path routing is used to reduce transmission time, then network traffic speed is improved, but network resource utilization becomes sub-optimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork traffic speedVSAvoidnetwork resource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the routing decision parameter from purely distance-based (shortest path) to cost-based (connection cost comparison). By calculating and comparing connection costs between direct paths and AccAD network paths, the system selects routes that optimize both speed and resource utilization, resolving the contradiction between fastest transmission and optimal resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If AccAD network acceleration is applied to all paths, then network service performance is improved, but unnecessary resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork service performanceVSAvoidnetwork resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies AccAD network acceleration selectively rather than universally. By comparing connection costs and applying acceleration only when the AccAD path cost is lower than the direct path cost plus threshold, the system achieves performance improvement only where needed, avoiding unnecessary resource consumption on paths where direct connection is already optimal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If direct connection is used for all network traffic, then network simplicity is maintained, but network service efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork routing simplicityVSAvoidnetwork service efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism (AccAD network with cost comparison logic) that sits between the client and server. This intermediary automatically determines whether to use direct connection or AccAD acceleration by comparing connection costs, maintaining routing simplicity from the user perspective while enabling efficient acceleration where beneficial.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9397930B2Network traffic routing optimization
Publication Date: 2016.07.19 SAP SE
  • US9397930B2 patent drawing
  • US9397930B2 patent drawing
  • US9397930B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure describes methods, systems, and computer program products for providing network traffic routing optimizations. One computer-implemented method includes calculating a direct connection cost for network traffic between two points in a network, the network including one or more nodes of an accelerated application delivery (AccAD) network, calculating an AccAD connection cost for the network traffic between the two points in the network using at least one node of the AccAD network, comparing the calculated direct connection cost and the AccAD connection cost, and determining whether the direct connection cost is greater than the sum of the AccAD connection cost and a minimum cost threshold value.