Vehicle Acceleration Suppression Override Using Dual Driver Inputs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicles face difficulty in accelerating due to unintended execution of acceleration suppression control even when a driver intentionally presses the accelerator pedal, leading to decreased convenience.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle system that includes a controller to perform acceleration suppression control based on accelerator pedal pressing, which can be canceled when two or more specific operation elements, such as the shift-up and shift-down levers, are operated simultaneously by the driver.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If acceleration suppression control is performed based on accelerator pedal pressing, then safety is improved by preventing sudden acceleration from erroneous pressing, but convenience deteriorates when the driver intentionally presses the accelerator pedal

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidconvenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The acceleration suppression control is made dynamic by allowing it to be canceled under specific conditions. When two or more operation elements are operated simultaneously, the control is canceled to enable intentional acceleration, while maintaining suppression during normal operation to prevent erroneous acceleration. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between safety and convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control parameter (acceleration suppression state) based on the number of simultaneously operated operation elements. When the count reaches two or more, the suppression control is canceled, allowing full acceleration. This parameter-based control strategy enables the system to adapt between safety-oriented and convenience-oriented modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If acceleration suppression control is continuously active, then harmful factors are reduced by preventing erroneous acceleration, but useful action is limited when rapid acceleration is needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerroneous accelerationVSAvoidrapid acceleration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system prepares for potential rapid acceleration needs by monitoring multiple operation elements. When the driver performs a specific combination of operations (two or more elements), the system preemptively cancels the acceleration suppression control, enabling immediate rapid acceleration without delay. This preliminary detection and response mechanism resolves the contradiction between preventing erroneous acceleration and enabling needed rapid acceleration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12370891B2Vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 SUBARU CORP
  • US12370891B2 patent drawing
  • US12370891B2 patent drawing
  • US12370891B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes one or more processors. The one or more processors include a controller. The controller is configured to: perform an acceleration suppression control, in which the acceleration suppression control is configured to suppress acceleration of the vehicle based on pressing of an accelerator pedal of the vehicle performed by a driver who drives the vehicle; and cancel the acceleration suppression control, when two or more operation elements provided in the vehicle are operated by the driver.