Acceleration Event Signatures for Mobile Device Input Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Physical hardware keys in mobile devices weaken over time, causing reliability issues, and occupy valuable circuitry space, while also being potential points for electrostatic discharge and design constraints.

Innovation Solution

Implementing acceleration event signatures using an accelerometer, filter, and signature correlator to detect and invoke functions based on predefined swipe patterns across ridged members on the device, reducing the need for physical keys and enhancing design flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If physical hardware keys are used for device control, then user interaction is enabled, but reliability degrades over time due to mechanical and electrical wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interactionVSAvoidkey durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical key pressing system with an accelerometer-based detection system. Instead of using physical keys that mechanically wear out, the device uses an accelerometer to detect taps, punches, or other contact patterns on the device surface, converting mechanical input into acceleration signals that are processed electronically to invoke functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital copy of the key interaction through acceleration event signatures. Rather than relying on the physical key itself, the system captures the essence of the interaction as an acceleration pattern and stores it as a signature definition, allowing the same function to be triggered multiple times without physical degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If physical hardware keys are added to the device, then control functionality is provided, but circuitry space is consumed that could be used for other components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol functionalityVSAvoidcircuitry space
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the key control functionality from the physical key hardware and relocates it to software-based acceleration signature recognition. By removing the need for physical keys and their associated circuitry, the device can use the same accelerometer (already present for other functions) to provide control capabilities, thereby freeing up circuitry space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the accelerometer multi-functional by using it both for its original purpose (detecting device movement or shocks) and for detecting user input patterns. This universal use of the accelerometer eliminates the need for separate dedicated key input circuitry, optimizing the use of available hardware resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If physical hardware keys are positioned on the device, then input control is enabled, but they create a point of entry for electrostatic discharge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput controlVSAvoidelectrostatic discharge risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the physical key interface that creates electrostatic discharge pathways by substituting it with contactless or surface-level acceleration detection. The accelerometer detects taps or punches on the device surface without requiring penetrating mechanical keys, thereby removing the conduit for electrostatic discharge while maintaining input control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If physical keys are implemented, then device control is achieved, but design flexibility is limited by the need to accommodate key structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice controlVSAvoiddesign flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic acceleration signature definitions that can be programmed to recognize various input patterns (single tap, double tap, punch, swipe) rather than being fixed to specific physical key locations. This allows the same accelerometer hardware to support multiple control functions and input methods, greatly enhancing design flexibility and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses programmable acceleration thresholds, timing parameters, and pattern recognition rules that can be adjusted to detect different user interactions. By changing these parameters rather than redesigning physical hardware, the system can adapt to different control schemes and user preferences, maximizing design versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution improves the reliability and design of mobile devices by eliminating the need for physical keys, reducing electrostatic discharge risks, and optimizing circuitry space, while allowing for more intuitive and durable user interactions.

Implementation Method 1

an accelerometer configured to receive an acceleration event

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

a filter configured to filter the acceleration event based on characteristics associated with the acceleration event

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal filtering: Filter (electronic)

Data Source

PatentUS9541966B2Systems and methods for utilizing acceleration event signatures
Publication Date: 2017.01.10 HTC CORP
  • US9541966B2 patent drawing
  • US9541966B2 patent drawing
  • US9541966B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for utilizing acceleration event signatures. One method for utilizing acceleration event signatures in an electronic device comprises receiving, by the electronic device, one or more acceleration events. The method further comprises determining whether the received one or more acceleration events correspond to one or more predefined signature definitions and invoking one or more functions based on the one or more acceleration events.