Accelerator Pedal Reaction Force Control for Smooth Pedaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing accelerator devices maintain a constant reaction force when a pedaling speed exceeds an acceleration intention boundary threshold, leading to deteriorated pedal operability and discomfort for the driver.

Innovation Solution

An accelerator device that includes a pedal lever, drive source, power transmission mechanism, and control unit, which applies an initial reaction force for a specified time and then reduces it through a time function, adjusting the reaction force based on pedaling speed to match the driver's acceleration intention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If reaction force is maintained when pedaling speed exceeds acceleration intention boundary threshold, then acceleration intention is supported, but pedaling operability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceleration intention supportVSAvoidpedaling operability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The reaction force control system dynamically adjusts the reaction force based on pedaling speed and time. Instead of maintaining a static reaction force, the system transitions from an initial reaction force to a reduced reaction force over time, making the system adaptive to the driver's continuous pedaling action and improving operability while supporting acceleration intention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the reaction force parameter from an initial value to a reduced value based on elapsed time and pedaling speed conditions. This parameter transformation allows the reaction force to evolve during the pedaling cycle, resolving the contradiction between supporting acceleration and maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If reaction force is reduced when pedaling speed exceeds acceleration intention boundary threshold, then pedaling operability improves, but acceleration intention support weakens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepedaling operabilityVSAvoidacceleration intention support
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies an initial reaction force at the start of pedaling to support acceleration intention, then transitions to a reduced reaction force after a predetermined elapsed time. This preliminary action ensures acceleration support is provided when needed, while subsequent reduction maintains ease of operation during continuous pedaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The reaction force control operates in temporal phases: an initial phase with higher reaction force to support acceleration intention, followed by a subsequent phase with reduced reaction force for ease of operation. This periodic temporal structure resolves the contradiction by applying different force levels at different times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If reaction force is applied continuously, then acceleration intention is consistently supported, but driver discomfort increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceleration intention supportVSAvoiddriver discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The reaction force control system dynamically transitions from an initial reaction force to a reduced reaction force based on elapsed time and pedaling speed. This dynamic adjustment reduces driver discomfort during continuous pedaling while maintaining acceleration intention support during the critical initial phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides cushioning by reducing the reaction force after a predetermined elapsed time, preventing excessive driver discomfort that would occur with continuous high reaction force application. This beforehand cushioning anticipates and mitigates the harmful effect of prolonged reaction force on driver comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device ensures smooth and comfortable pedaling operations by appropriately applying and reducing reaction forces, enhancing pedal operability and matching pedaling to the driver's acceleration intentions.

Implementation Method 1

The drive source is configured to generate a driving force when being energized

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12617272B2Accelerator device
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 DENSO CORP
  • US12617272B2 patent drawing
  • US12617272B2 patent drawing
  • US12617272B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An accelerator device includes a pedal lever, a drive source, a power transmission mechanism, and a control unit. The pedal lever is operable in response to a pedaling operation. The drive source generates a driving force when being energized. The power transmission mechanism transmits the driving force of the drive source to the pedal lever, and applies a reaction force in an opposite direction to a pedaling direction of the pedal lever. The control unit includes a reaction force controller that controls the reaction force applied to the pedal lever by controlling the drive source. The reaction force controller holds an initial reaction force for a reaction force hold time from a start of reaction force application, and performs a reaction force reduction control in which the reaction force is reduced as a time function after an elapse of the reaction force hold time.