Disaggregated Accelerator Sled Orchestration for Kernel-Matched Tasks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In data centers, accelerator devices often go unused because they are localized to general-purpose processors and can only provide acceleration for specific tasks, leading to wasted resources since applications that do not utilize their capabilities are executed at standard speeds.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a system where an orchestrator server dynamically assigns tasks to accelerator sleds with matching kernels, allowing any compute sled to utilize available acceleration resources across the network, even if they are not locally present, by configuring and reconfiguring kernels as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If accelerator devices are localized to general-purpose processors, then the structure is simple and management is easy, but the accelerator devices go unused when applications do not require their specific acceleration capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccelerator utilizationVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments accelerator devices from general-purpose processors into independent accelerator sleds that can be dynamically allocated. Each accelerator function is separated into discrete units (e.g., encryption accelerators, compression accelerators) that can be independently assigned to different applications based on demand, rather than being permanently bound to specific processors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The accelerator pool creates a universal resource that can serve multiple general-purpose processors and diverse applications. The same accelerator device can be dynamically assigned to different applications requiring different acceleration capabilities, making the accelerator infrastructure multi-functional and adaptable to various workload requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If accelerator devices are dedicated to specific general-purpose processors, then the assignment is straightforward, but resources are wasted when the application does not utilize the acceleration capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication execution speedVSAvoidresource wastage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic accelerator assignment where accelerators are not statically bound to processors but are allocated on-demand based on application requirements. The orchestration layer continuously monitors workload characteristics and reassigns accelerators dynamically, ensuring that acceleration resources are actively utilized only when needed and can be reassigned to other uses when idle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Applications can request specific acceleration capabilities through the orchestration interface, and the system automatically matches and assigns appropriate accelerators from the pool. The workload itself effectively selects the acceleration resources it needs without manual configuration, enabling acceleration to be applied only when and where beneficial.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If a pool of accelerator devices is created and dynamically assigned, then resource utilization is maximized, but the system architecture and management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccelerator allocation flexibilityVSAvoidaccelerator management
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The orchestration layer serves as an intermediary between applications and the accelerator pool, abstracting the complexity of accelerator management. It handles accelerator selection, assignment, configuration, and monitoring automatically, allowing applications to request acceleration without needing to understand the underlying accelerator infrastructure or management complexities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the orchestration layer monitors accelerator utilization, performance metrics, and workload characteristics. Based on this feedback, it dynamically adjusts accelerator assignments to optimize resource utilization, automatically reassigning accelerators when workloads change or when accelerators become idle, thereby simplifying management through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11995330B2Technologies for providing accelerated functions as a service in a disaggregated architecture
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 INTEL CORP
  • US11995330B2 patent drawing
  • US11995330B2 patent drawing
  • US11995330B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Technologies for providing accelerated functions as a service in a disaggregated architecture include a compute device that is to receive a request for an accelerated task. The task is associated with a kernel usable by an accelerator sled communicatively coupled to the compute device to execute the task. The compute device is further to determine, in response to the request and with a database indicative of kernels and associated accelerator sleds, an accelerator sled that includes an accelerator device configured with the kernel associated with the request. Additionally, the compute device is to assign the task to the determined accelerator sled for execution. Other embodiments are also described and claimed.