Hardware Accelerator Conditional Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cameras and other devices with limited processing power face challenges in performing image processing tasks like computer vision due to the need for explicit data transfer between heterogeneous processors, which increases code complexity, reduces portability, and consumes time and power.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a hardware accelerator to perform splitter and combiner operations, allowing data to be processed and flagged as active or inactive based on decision values, thereby minimizing data movement and enabling efficient handling of divergent control flow, even with limited processing power.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If explicit data transfer is performed between heterogeneous processors, then code complexity increases and portability decreases, but data processing can be performed on specialized hardware

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing capabilityVSAvoidcode complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary data structure (active/inactive flags) that mediates between the general-purpose processor and hardware accelerator. This intermediary mechanism allows conditional flow control to be handled within the hardware accelerator without requiring explicit data transfers back to the general-purpose processor, thereby reducing code complexity while maintaining specialized hardware processing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the data flow into multiple independent branches, each with its own active/inactive flag status. This segmentation allows different data paths to be processed independently in parallel on the hardware accelerator, improving productivity while the flag-based control mechanism keeps the overall system manageable and portable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If explicit data transfer is performed between heterogeneous processors, then code portability decreases, but hardware acceleration can be utilized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidcode portability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal flag-based control mechanism that can work with different hardware accelerator architectures and programming models. The active/inactive flag system provides a portable interface that abstracts the underlying hardware differences, allowing the same code to run on various heterogeneous processor configurations while still utilizing hardware acceleration for improved processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If data is transferred between heterogeneous processors, then power consumption increases, but complex image processing tasks can be performed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage processing capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the conditional flow control logic from the general-purpose processor and implements it directly in the hardware accelerator using active/inactive flags. This extraction eliminates the need for repeated data transfers between processors, reducing power consumption while maintaining the capability to perform complex image processing tasks on the hardware accelerator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If conditional flow is handled by transferring data between processors, then processing time increases, but control flow can be managed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol flow managementVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses active/inactive flags as an intermediary control mechanism that enables conditional flow management entirely within the hardware accelerator. This intermediary approach allows control flow decisions to be made and executed in parallel without requiring sequential data transfers between processors, thereby maintaining ease of control flow management while significantly reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3404534B1Conditional flow with hardware acceleration
Publication Date: 2020.04.15 AXIS
  • EP3404534B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3404534B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3404534B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A method and system are disclosed. The method may include receiving instructions in a hardware accelerator coupled to a computing device. The instructions may describe operations and data dependencies between the operations. The operations and the data dependencies may be predetermined. The method may include performing a splitter operation in the hardware accelerator, performing an operation in each of a plurality of branches, and performing a combiner operation in the hardware accelerator.