Lorentz-Force Accelerometer Startup Control for Proof Mass Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The initial application of Lorentz forces on the proof mass during the startup of an accelerometer system can cause unintended contact between components, affecting bias stability and scale factor, which reduces the accuracy of acceleration measurements.

Innovation Solution

Reducing the amplitude of electric currents through coils for a threshold period during startup to minimize Lorentz forces and proof mass displacement, followed by increasing current amplitude once the threshold is elapsed to maintain the proof mass at the null position.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high amplitude electric currents are applied through coils during startup, then the accelerometer system can quickly reach full functionality, but the proof mass may displace from null position causing unintended component contact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestartup speedVSAvoidcomponent contact risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by applying reduced current amplitude during an initial startup period (first time interval) and then switching to full current amplitude after the proof mass has settled (second time interval). This time-dependent current modulation prevents component contact during startup while maintaining full functionality afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by first applying reduced amplitude currents during startup to safely position the proof mass without causing unintended contact, before progressively increasing to full operational current. This preliminary reduced-current phase prevents harmful effects before full operation begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If electric currents are increased to maintain proof mass at null position, then navigation accuracy is improved, but the risk of component contact increases during startup

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceleration measurement accuracyVSAvoidcomponent contact
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system periodically transitions from reduced current mode during startup to full current mode after the proof mass settles. This ensures measurement precision is achieved without causing component contact, as full current is only applied after the risk period has passed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the current amplitude time-dependent rather than static. The current transitions from reduced to full amplitude based on the operational phase, allowing the system to adapt current levels to minimize harmful effects while maintaining measurement precision when safe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If full current amplitude is applied immediately at startup, then the accelerometer reaches full capability quickly, but bias stability and scale factor are affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefull capability reach timeVSAvoidbias stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary reduced current during startup before full operational current is applied. This preliminary phase allows the system to initialize without causing unwanted mechanical contact that would affect bias stability and scale factor, while still progressing toward full capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic action with two distinct current amplitude phases: reduced amplitude during startup and full amplitude afterward. This ensures bias stability is maintained during the critical startup period when the proof mass is most vulnerable to displacement-induced errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the risk of component contact and maintains accurate acceleration measurements by ensuring the proof mass remains at the null position, enhancing navigation accuracy.

Implementation Method 1

electric currents flow through the coils within the accelerometer system which, when interacting with Magnetic flux within the accelerometer system, apply Lorentz forces on the proof mass within the accelerometer system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS20250377376A1Accelerometer with proof mass displacement reduction feature
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US20250377376A1 patent drawing
  • US20250377376A1 patent drawing
  • US20250377376A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An accelerometer system comprising: a first magnetic assembly comprising a first pole piece and a first magnet; a second magnetic assembly comprising a second pole piece and a second magnet; a proof mass between the first magnetic assembly and the second magnetic assembly; a first coil disposed around the first pole piece; and a second coil disposed around the second pole piece; and processing circuitry configured to: cause a first current to flow through the first coil to apply a first Lorentz force to the proof mass; cause a second current to flow through the second coil to apply a second Lorentz force to the proof mass; and limit a maximum amplitude of the first current and the second current for at least a threshold period of time.