Access Category Enforcement in Wireless LANs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

User terminals in wireless local area networks (WLANs) often ignore assigned access categories, leading to inconsistent priority levels and failure to meet quality of service (QoS) goals, as existing standards lack a mechanism to enforce priority levels.

Innovation Solution

A control function is implemented in access points or switches to monitor and enforce transmission priority levels by analyzing frames for compliance with assigned priority schemes, allowing for appropriate priority level assignment and enforcement actions if non-compliance is detected.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If user terminals automatically select higher priority access categories, then transmission speed is improved, but quality of service goals are not met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission speedVSAvoidquality of service compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The access point receives feedback from user terminals about the access category they actually used for transmission. The system compares this feedback against the assigned access category and takes enforcement actions when mismatches occur, creating a closed-loop control system that ensures QoS compliance while allowing terminals to transmit at optimal speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The access point acts as an intermediary between the user terminal and the wireless channel. It assigns access categories to terminals, monitors their actual transmission behavior, and enforces compliance by controlling channel access. This intermediary role allows the system to maintain both speed optimization and QoS reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If access categories are assigned to user terminals, then quality of service is improved, but enforcement capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of serviceVSAvoidenforcement mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses self-service mechanisms where user terminals autonomously select access categories based on their transmission needs, and the access point automatically monitors and enforces compliance. This reduces the need for complex centralized control while maintaining QoS reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The access point implements a feedback mechanism that automatically monitors transmission behavior and compares it against assigned access categories. When non-compliance is detected, the system automatically takes enforcement actions, eliminating the need for complex manual enforcement mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8954109B2Access category enforcement in wireless local area networks
Publication Date: 2015.02.10 APPLE INC
  • US8954109B2 patent drawing
  • US8954109B2 patent drawing
  • US8954109B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a control function in an access point, switch, or like node on a wireless local area network. The control function operates to ensure frames transmitted by a user terminal are transmitted using an appropriate transmission priority scheme. The control function will assist and provide an appropriate priority level to the user terminal. Frames transmitted from the user terminal are passed through the control function, which will analyze priority level information provided in the frames to determine if the frames were transmitted using the appropriate transmission priority scheme. An enforcement action may be taken in response to identifying frames that were not transmitted using the appropriate transmission priority scheme.