Access Control Analysis Apparatus for Policy Decision Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing access control systems face challenges in accurately determining access control actions due to limitations in policy expression and decision-making processes.

Innovation Solution

An analysis apparatus and method that acquire a dataset of access attribute patterns and associated control actions, and estimate the order and magnitude of the degree of influence of a second pattern on the access control action using the acquired dataset.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If access control policies are defined with limited policy expression capability, then the system is easier to manage and operate, but the accuracy of access control action decisions is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy management easeVSAvoidaccess control decision accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the access control decision-making process into multiple independent components: policy rules, historical access data, pattern recognition models, and influence degree calculations. This allows the system to maintain simple policy expressions while achieving accurate decisions through comprehensive analysis of multiple segmented factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary analysis apparatus that mediates between the simple policy expression and the complex decision-making requirements. This intermediary component analyzes historical data, recognizes patterns, and calculates influence degrees to bridge the gap between simple policies and accurate decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive access control data and complex analysis methods are used, then the accuracy of access control action decisions is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control decision accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The analysis apparatus performs self-service by automatically acquiring historical access data, recognizing patterns, and calculating influence degrees without requiring complex manual configuration. The system serves itself by autonomously analyzing data and generating decision recommendations, reducing the perceived complexity for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms complex qualitative decision-making into quantitative parameter analysis by calculating specific influence degrees for different access attributes. This parameterization approach simplifies the system architecture by converting complex judgments into measurable parameters that can be systematically processed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If the influence degree of access attributes is not quantified, then the policy expression remains simple, but the ability to accurately decide access control actions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy expression simplicityVSAvoidaccess control decision reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective mechanical judgment with automated computational analysis. Instead of relying on manual assessment of attribute influence, the system uses automated data analysis and pattern recognition to objectively calculate influence degrees, thereby improving reliability while maintaining policy expression simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by analyzing historical access data and using the results to refine pattern recognition and influence degree calculations. This feedback loop continuously improves decision reliability while keeping the policy expression structure simple and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250068750A1Analysis apparatus, analysis method, and non-transitory computer readable medium
Publication Date: 2025.02.27 NEC CORP
  • US20250068750A1 patent drawing
  • US20250068750A1 patent drawing
  • US20250068750A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An analysis apparatus according to an example embodiment of the present disclosure includes at least one memory configured to store instructions; and at least one processor configured to execute the instructions to acquire a data set in which a plurality of combinations of a first pattern of one or more elements indicating an access attribute and an access control action associated with the first pattern are defined, and a second pattern of one or more elements indicating an access attribute, and estimate at least one of an order or magnitude of the degree of influence of the second pattern influencing the action by using the data set and the second pattern.