Access Edge Node Data Traffic Aggregation via Service Bindings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

IP networks face challenges in supporting a broad range of quality of service (QoS) levels due to their design principles, which result in 'best effort' networks that struggle to handle increased data traffic from growing user domains and service provider domains, lacking a long-term solution for tangible and non-destructive Quality of Service (QoS) improvements.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of an access edge node, a decentralized node, and an access node, along with a method for efficiently aggregating data traffic over an access domain, utilizing service agents, service bindings, and Virtual Local Area Networks (VLANs) to provide coordinated usage of the access network and various levels of QoS, by establishing service bindings and managing data traffic aggregation between user domains and service provider domains.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If IP networks rely on routers performing minimal operations for routing data traffic, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but quality of service deteriorates and the network cannot support increased data traffic demands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting operation simplicityVSAvoidquality of service
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The network is segmented into multiple domains (access domain, network service provider domains, application service provider domains) with specialized nodes for different functions. Access edge nodes handle service-specific operations while core routers perform simple routing, dividing the QoS management burden from the routing function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Access edge nodes act as intermediaries between user domains and service provider domains. These intermediary nodes perform service-specific processing and traffic aggregation, shielding core routers from complex QoS management while ensuring service quality requirements are met.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the number of user domains and service provider domains increases to meet growing data traffic demands, then productivity and service coverage are improved, but network complexity increases and quality of service deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata traffic handling capacityVSAvoidnetwork structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The network is organized into hierarchical domains with access edge nodes at the perimeter, service provider domains in the middle, and core routing infrastructure at the center. This segmentation allows independent scaling of each domain without proportionally increasing overall network complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The network architecture adds a domain dimension to the traditional flat routing structure. By organizing nodes into multiple service provider domains and application service provider domains, the network can scale horizontally across domains while maintaining manageable complexity within each domain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If IP networks are designed with best effort routing principles, then device complexity and operational simplicity are maintained, but the ability to support quality of service for network service provider domains and application service provider domains deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting device complexityVSAvoidquality of service support capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Different parts of the network have different functional qualities. Access edge nodes are equipped with service-specific processing capabilities for QoS management, while core routers maintain simple forwarding functionality. This local differentiation allows QoS support without making all network devices complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Access edge nodes serve as intermediary entities that translate service quality requirements into routing decisions. These intermediaries handle the complexity of QoS policy enforcement and traffic aggregation, allowing core routers to remain simple while the network as a whole gains QoS adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS7706265B2Decentralized node, access edge node, and access node for aggregating data traffic over an access domain, and method thereof
Publication Date: 2010.04.27 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US7706265B2 patent drawing
  • US7706265B2 patent drawing
  • US7706265B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method, an access node, an access edge node and a decentralized node for aggregating data traffic over an access domain. The decentralized node corresponds to one of the service providers, and is located in closer proximity with user domains to be serviced. The decentralized node maintains over the access domain one or several Virtual Local Area Networks, for aggregating thereon data traffic to be exchanged with the user domains, on behalf of the service provider domain. To allow proper aggregation of the data traffic, service bindings are created and stored at the access edge node, and further stored at the decentralized node and at the access node. Therefore, aggregation of the data traffic between the decentralized node and the user domains over the access domain is performed in accordance with the created service bindings.