Access Node Protocol Conflict Management via Priority Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In telecommunication systems, newly established access nodes may not be recognized by neighboring access nodes, leading to inefficiencies in communication and service quality, as existing systems lack effective mechanisms for updating neighbor relations and managing load balancing protocols.

Innovation Solution

The system determines network characteristics for access nodes and classifies wireless devices into priority classes based on traffic requirements, then instructs high-priority devices to perform either a neighbor relations protocol or a load balancing protocol based on network conditions, using protocols like Automatic Neighbor Relations (ANR) and load balancing to optimize communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a newly established access node is added to the network, then network coverage and capacity are improved, but neighboring access nodes remain unaware of the new node, leading to incomplete neighbor relations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork coverageVSAvoidneighbor relation information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where access nodes continuously exchange information about detected neighboring nodes. When a new access node is established, it transmits its identity to neighboring nodes, which then update their neighbor relation tables. This feedback loop ensures that neighbor information remains current without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Access nodes automatically discover and register new neighboring nodes through self-service mechanisms. The system enables nodes to autonomously update their own neighbor relation tables by monitoring communications on the network, eliminating the need for centralized management or manual configuration updates when new nodes are added.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If wireless devices are classified into priority classes based on traffic requirements, then service quality for high-priority devices is improved, but system complexity increases due to additional classification and protocol management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidprotocol management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different protocol behaviors to different priority classes of wireless devices. High-priority devices receive enhanced neighbor relations protocol treatment ensuring accurate and timely neighbor information, while low-priority devices use standard load balancing protocols. This local differentiation of quality of service allows the system to optimize performance for critical traffic without unnecessarily complicating the handling of all devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10542451B1Systems and methods for managing conflicts between access node protocols
Publication Date: 2020.01.21 SPRINT SPECTRUM LLC
  • US10542451B1 patent drawing
  • US10542451B1 patent drawing
  • US10542451B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for managing conflicts between a load balancing protocol and a neighbor relations protocol. Network characteristics for an access node in communication with a plurality of wireless devices may be determined. The plurality of wireless devices may be classified into a high priority class and a low priority class based on a traffic requirement for each of the wireless devices. The determined network conditions my then be compared to a criteria. Based on the comparison, the high priority class of wireless devices may be instructed to perform one of a neighbor relations protocol and a load balancing protocol.