Access Point Positioning With User-Guided Network Planning
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing wireless network planning tools struggle to efficiently place access points, requiring manual intervention for optimal performance, which is time-consuming and prone to errors.
Innovation Solution
A hybrid network planning approach that combines automated tools with user input, allowing users to interactively update access point positions, using tools like Voronoi decomposition or brute force methods, to generate and refine network plans.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If automated network planning tools are used to place access points, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The system displays the generated network plan to the user and accepts user input to update the plan. This feedback loop allows automated tools to provide initial placements while users can refine positions based on practical considerations, combining speed with precision.
Solution Approach 2:
The automated network planning tool generates access point placements independently based on algorithmic criteria (Voronoi decomposition or brute force methods), providing self-service capability that improves productivity without requiring constant manual intervention.
2Manufacturing precision
If manual access point placement is performed by skilled personnel, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The automated network planning tool performs preliminary access point placement based on algorithmic optimization before user review. This preliminary action provides a solid foundation that users can then refine, combining automated efficiency with manual precision where needed.
Solution Approach 2:
The system acts as an intermediary between automated planning algorithms and user expertise. It presents algorithm-generated placements to users for review and modification, allowing both automated speed and manual precision to contribute to the final result.
3Ease of operation
If automated network planning tools are used, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The network plan is dynamic and can be updated based on user input. The system transitions from a static automated generation to a dynamic refinement process, allowing users to adjust positions while maintaining the ease of automated initial planning.
Data Source
AI summary
A hybrid solution for network planning is disclosed. In the hybrid solution, a computer generated network plan is displayed with at least indications of best positions for access points to be inserted. When a user input causing a change to the planning information is detected, the planning information is updated, updated indications of best positions for access points to be inserted are determined automatically, and the network plan with at least the updated indications of best positions for access points to be inserted is displayed.


