Access Station Crank Hatch Mechanism for Compact Safe Retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional access stations in automated storage and retrieval systems require large mechanisms for opening hatches, occupying significant space and reducing efficiency, and lack effective safety mechanisms to protect users from potential hazards.

Innovation Solution

An access station with a hatch system featuring a movable hatch cover operated by a crank and actuator, which minimizes the footprint and enhances safety through a perpendicular elongate guide and releasable coupling, allowing ergonomic and safe access to storage containers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If large mechanisms such as belts are used to open hatches, then the hatch can be opened and closed, but the space between the hatch and the front of the access station increases, reducing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehatch opening capabilityVSAvoidaccess station footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional belt mechanism with a crank and guide mechanism. The crank converts rotational motion from the actuator into linear reciprocating motion of the guide, which directly moves the hatch cover. This substitution eliminates the need for large belt mechanisms while achieving the same hatch opening function, thereby reducing the access station footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a belt that pulls the hatch open from behind, the invention uses a crank mechanism where the actuator rotates the crank, and the reciprocating guide translates this rotation into direct linear motion of the hatch cover. This inverted approach to motion transmission achieves hatch operation with significantly reduced space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Ease of operation

If large mechanisms are used for opening hatches, then the hatch can be operated, but the distance between the front side and rear side of the access station increases, reducing transporting efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehatch operationVSAvoidbin transporting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The crank and guide mechanism replaces space-consuming belt systems, allowing the hatch to be operated within a compact access station structure. This reduction in internal space directly improves the efficiency of transporting bins between the user and the grid, as the same mechanism achieves hatch operation without extending the distance between the front and rear sides of the access station.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If mechanisms such as belts are used, then the hatch can be opened, but power is required to open and close the hatch continuously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehatch opening and closingVSAvoidpower consumption for hatch operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The crank and guide mechanism is designed so that the actuator's rotational motion is directly converted into the linear motion needed to open and close the hatch. The mechanism itself provides the mechanical advantage needed to move the hatch cover without requiring continuous power input, as the reciprocating guide ensures efficient force transmission throughout the motion cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If safety mechanisms are added to protect users, then user protection is improved, but the complexity of the access station increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidaccess station structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reciprocating guide acts as an intermediary safety mechanism. Its elongate shape with restricted movement zones creates a physical barrier that prevents users from accessing dangerous areas of the mechanism. The guide's design inherently limits where components can move, providing passive safety without adding complex active protection systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4588837A1Access station
Publication Date: 2025.07.23 AUTOSTORE TECH AS
  • EP4588837A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4588837A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4588837A1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

The disclosure relates to an access station for accessing a storage container of an automated storage and retrieval system, wherein the access station comprises: a panel with an access aperture providing access to a container compartment; a hatch system for opening and closing the access aperture of the panel, wherein the hatch system comprises: a hatch cover movable between a closed state in which the hatch cover is preventing access to the container compartment via the access aperture of the panel and an open state in which the hatch cover is allowing access to the container compartment via the access aperture of the panel; a crank having a first end and a second end, wherein the second end of the crank is reciprocating in an elongate guide which is attached to the hatch cover; and an actuator configured to move the hatch cover between the closed state and the open state by rotating the crank between a first position and a second position.