Accessibility Alert Processing for Content Sharing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users generating content in computer systems often do not know whether recipients require accessibility content, leading to inaccessible content for users with disabilities or mobile devices, as they may not run accessibility checks.

Innovation Solution

A computing system architecture that includes accessibility content alert processing, where user properties are accessed to determine if recipients need accessibility content, and if so, performs alert processing, including tip generation, link generation, and automatic checking or correction using accessibility systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users generate content without accessibility checks, then content creation is fast and simple, but the content becomes inaccessible to users with disabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent creation simplicityVSAvoidcontent accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs accessibility checks automatically at the time of content creation or sharing, before the content is consumed by recipients. This preliminary action ensures accessibility requirements are met without requiring users to manually check accessibility later, thus maintaining simplicity while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The accessibility checking system operates autonomously without requiring user intervention. The system automatically detects accessibility issues and provides guidance for correction, allowing the content creation process to remain simple while accessibility compliance is handled self-service style by the system itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If users manually check accessibility for each recipient, then content accessibility is ensured, but the content creation process becomes complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent accessibilityVSAvoidcontent creation process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs accessibility checking without requiring users to manually initiate or manage the process. Users simply create content and share it; the system handles accessibility verification autonomously, maintaining reliability while avoiding complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides automated feedback to users about accessibility issues in the content. This feedback mechanism guides users on what needs to be corrected without requiring them to understand complex accessibility standards, thus ensuring reliability while keeping the process simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If accessibility checks are performed automatically, then content accessibility is improved, but processing time and system resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent accessibilityVSAvoidcontent creation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Accessibility checking is performed automatically as part of the content creation or sharing workflow, before the content is finalized or distributed. This preliminary action catches accessibility issues early when they are easiest to fix, ensuring reliability without adding significant time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs accessibility checking selectively based on content type, recipient preferences, and context. Not all content requires full accessibility checks - the system applies checking at appropriate levels, ensuring reliability for content that needs it while minimizing processing time for content that doesn't require extensive verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Ease of operation

If users are unaware of recipient accessibility needs, then content sharing is straightforward, but accessibility requirements are not met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent sharing simplicityVSAvoidrecipient accessibility information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically provides feedback to users about recipient accessibility needs at the point of content sharing. This feedback informs users whether accessibility checks should be performed without requiring users to manually query or remember recipient preferences, thus maintaining simplicity while preventing information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary between the content creator and the recipient's accessibility requirements. It automatically retrieves and communicates accessibility needs information to the user at the appropriate moment, bridging the information gap without complicating the sharing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10554598B2Accessibility processing when making content available to others
Publication Date: 2020.02.04 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US10554598B2 patent drawing
  • US10554598B2 patent drawing
  • US10554598B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Content is created and is made consumable by a user. A Property associated with the user is accessed to determine whether the user is to receive accessibility content. If so, accessibility content alert processing is performed on the content.