Interventional Procedure Planning for Accessible Instrument Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for deploying minimally invasive interventional instruments struggle to identify an accessible deployment location within anatomical passageways due to constraints of the instrument or anatomy, making it difficult to reach target tissue locations effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a navigation planning module to identify a planned deployment location for an interventional instrument by considering both the operational capability of the instrument and patient anatomy, including factors such as bending capability, anatomical constraints, and target structure proximity, using sensor feedback to refine the location if necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If the deployment location is selected as the point within the modeled passageways closest to the target tissue location, then the distance to the target structure is minimized, but the accessibility of the deployment location becomes difficult given the constraints of the interventional instrument or the anatomy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistance to target structureVSAvoidaccessibility of deployment location
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of instrument operational capabilities (bending, extending, articulating) before determining the deployment location. By pre-assessing what the instrument can physically achieve within the anatomical constraints, the system identifies deployment locations that are both close to the target and actually accessible by the instrument, avoiding the pitfall of selecting theoretically optimal but practically unreachable locations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used to select deployment location from simple geometric proximity to a multi-parameter evaluation that includes instrument-specific operational capabilities. By incorporating parameters such as maximum bend radius, extension length, and articulation angles into the location selection process, the system transforms the deployment location determination from a purely geometric problem to a feasibility-aware optimization problem

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the system considers operational capability constraints of the interventional instrument, then the deployment location becomes more accessible, but the distance to the target structure may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility of deployment locationVSAvoiddistance to target structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically evaluates deployment location feasibility by simulating the instrument's movement through the anatomical passageways. Rather than using static geometric calculations, the system models the dynamic capabilities of the instrument (bending, extending, articulating) to determine which locations are actually reachable, allowing it to balance accessibility with proximity to target

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a minimally invasive approach is used to reduce tissue damage, then patient recovery time and discomfort are reduced, but the ability to reach certain target tissue locations becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue damageVSAvoidability to reach target location
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a virtual simulation environment as an intermediary between instrument selection and actual procedure execution. By creating a virtual model of the patient's anatomy and simulating instrument navigation within this model, the system can evaluate multiple instrument options and approaches without causing actual tissue damage, then select the optimal minimally invasive approach that still achieves the therapeutic goal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12408891B2Systems and methods for interventional procedure planning
Publication Date: 2025.09.09 INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS INC
  • US12408891B2 patent drawing
  • US12408891B2 patent drawing
  • US12408891B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for performing an interventional procedure includes an interventional instrument and a control system. The control system includes a processor and a memory comprising machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the control system to: receive a model of an anatomic structure, the anatomic structure including a plurality of passageways; identify a target structure in the model; identify a planned deployment location for positioning a distal tip of the interventional instrument to perform the interventional procedure on the target structure; determine whether an angle of approach of the distal tip relative to a passageway wall of a passageway of the plurality of passageways at the planned deployment location is acceptable; and navigate the interventional instrument, via computer control or based on user input, to perform the interventional procedure on the target structure.