Accessible Interface Content Generation for Personalized UI Adaptation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional accessibility guidelines, such as WCAG, fail to account for individual user preferences and are inadequate for non-web platforms, leading to inaccessible digital content and potential legal and reputational risks for organizations.
Innovation Solution
A system utilizing machine learning techniques to generate tailored, accessible interface content by determining user populations and platform preferences, modifying interface components to enhance accessibility across various platforms, including web, mobile, and desktop applications.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If conventional WCAG guidelines are used to ensure accessibility, then compliance with accessibility standards is achieved, but the system fails to account for individual user preferences and varying levels of disabilities
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic accessibility adjustments by using machine learning models to continuously adapt interface content based on individual user preferences and interactions. The system transitions from static WCAG compliance to dynamic customization where interface features such as text size, contrast, and layout are automatically adjusted in real-time based on user-specific needs identified through ML analysis.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies local quality by customizing specific interface content components rather than applying uniform accessibility adjustments across the entire interface. The ML framework identifies and modifies only those interface elements that require adjustment for individual users, such as modifying text properties for visually impaired users while leaving other elements unchanged, thereby achieving personalized accessibility without unnecessary modifications.
2Adaptability or versatility
If WCAG guidelines are applied to web content, then web accessibility is improved, but the system fails to address other technology platforms such as native mobile applications or desktop applications
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements universality by creating a platform-agnostic ML framework that can generate and adapt interface content across multiple technology platforms including web, mobile, and desktop applications. The system uses unified accessibility models that can be deployed across different platforms, ensuring consistent accessibility effectiveness regardless of the specific platform being used.
3Adaptability or versatility
If tailored interface content is generated using machine learning, then individual user accessibility needs are addressed, but the system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces an intermediary ML framework that sits between the user and the interface content generation process. This intermediary system handles the complexity of analyzing user preferences, determining accessibility needs, and generating customized interface content, thereby shielding end users from the underlying system complexity while still delivering personalized accessibility.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements self-service by enabling the ML system to automatically analyze user interactions, determine accessibility preferences, and generate customized interface content without requiring manual configuration or intervention. The system learns and adapts to individual user needs autonomously, reducing the operational complexity burden on users and administrators.
Data Source
AI summary
Systems, apparatuses, methods, and computer program products are disclosed for providing accessible interface content. An example method includes receiving base interface content comprising one or more interface content components and determining a user population of interest and a platform of interest. The example method further includes generating one or more interface feature sets using a pre-processing model. The example method further includes modifying one or more interface content components for each interface feature set using feature modification models. The example method further includes generating modified interface content using a multimodal model based on the one or more interface feature sets and providing the modified interface content.


