Accessible Ride Hailing Platform With Dynamic Route Alteration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Senior citizens and individuals with disabilities face mobility challenges in accessing on-demand transportation services due to the lack of mobility-friendly vehicles and inflexible scheduling in existing ride-hailing and ride-sharing platforms, which restricts their freedom and efficiency in daily tasks.

Innovation Solution

A ride-hailing platform that integrates multiple transportation providers, allowing users to request rides with specific disability settings, matching them with vehicles equipped to handle their needs, and dynamically altering routes to accommodate mobility features, ensuring efficient and accessible transportation without advanced scheduling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If standard personal vehicles are used for ride-hailing services, then service coverage is expanded to the general population, but accessibility for senior citizens and people with disabilities is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidaccessibility for disabled persons
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The ride-hailing platform segments the vehicle fleet into different categories based on accessibility features. Standard vehicles serve able-bodied passengers while specially equipped vehicles with ramps, lifts, or wheelchair securement serve passengers with disabilities. This segmentation allows the system to maintain broad service coverage while ensuring specialized accessibility where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The platform applies local quality by assigning specific accessibility features to specific vehicles and matching them to corresponding passenger needs. Each vehicle is tagged with its accessibility capabilities (e.g., ramp access, wheelchair securement, hearing-impaired assistance), and the routing system locally optimizes matches between vehicle capabilities and passenger requirements at the point of service request.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If paratransit providers use advanced scheduling with fixed pickup windows, then service reliability is improved, but wait times and service flexibility significantly increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice reliabilityVSAvoidwait times
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The platform transforms the static, fixed-schedule paratransit model into a dynamic on-demand system. Pickup times and locations are flexible and determined in real-time based on passenger requests, driver availability, and route optimization. The system dynamically adjusts schedules while maintaining reliability through real-time tracking and communication, eliminating the need for rigid advance booking windows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements real-time feedback loops between passengers, drivers, and the platform. Passengers can provide immediate feedback on pickup locations and timing preferences, drivers can report availability and status updates, and the platform continuously optimizes routes based on this feedback. This creates a responsive system that maintains reliability through continuous adjustment rather than rigid pre-scheduling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If paratransit providers offer varying degrees of different services for different disabilities, then service customization is improved, but system complexity and customer understanding significantly increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice customizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The platform creates a universal interface that handles multiple disability types through a single standardized request process. Whether a passenger has mobility, visual, hearing, or cognitive impairments, they use the same app interface to request service. The system universally processes all requests through the same matching algorithm, which then assigns the appropriate vehicle type and driver training based on the specific needs indicated in the request.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by parameterizing accessibility requirements. Instead of creating separate service protocols for each disability type, the platform uses standardized parameters (e.g., wheelchair access needed, hearing assistance required, visual impairment level) that feed into the routing and vehicle assignment algorithms. This parameterized approach allows flexible customization while maintaining system simplicity through standardized data structures and processing logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If ride-hailing platforms use on-demand services without advanced scheduling, then service flexibility is improved, but capacity utilization and efficiency significantly decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice flexibilityVSAvoidcapacity utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The platform performs preliminary actions by pre-positioning accessible vehicles in areas with high demand for disability services. Based on historical data and predicted demand patterns, the system proactively deploys vehicles to neighborhoods or times when disabled passengers are likely to request service. This preliminary positioning reduces wait times and improves capacity utilization by having vehicles ready before requests are made, rather than reacting to each request individually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuity of useful action by optimizing routes to minimize empty vehicle miles and maximize passenger-carrying capacity. The routing algorithm continuously adjusts driver paths to pick up multiple passengers heading in similar directions, even if their destinations differ. This keeps vehicles in productive use longer and reduces the need for excessive vehicle deployment, thereby improving capacity utilization while maintaining on-demand flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS11842304B2Accessible ride hailing and transit platform
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US11842304B2 patent drawing
  • US11842304B2 patent drawing
  • US11842304B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus for a ride-hailing platform. The ride-hailing platform includes one or more processors and a memory. The memory is configured to store computer-readable instructions that when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations including obtaining, from multiple transportation providers, multiple ride-sharing routes for multiple ride-sharing vehicles. The operations include obtaining a ride-hailing request including one or more disability settings for a user, a location of the user and a destination of the user. The operations include determining that a first ride-sharing vehicle should transport the user based on the one or more disability settings of the user. The operations include altering a first ride-sharing route to transport the user from the location of the user to the destination of the user and providing the altered first ride-sharing route to a driver of the first ride-sharing vehicle.