Automated Accident Data Recommendation System for Evidence Collection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for documenting and investigating vehicle accidents are often retrospective and inefficient, leading to diminished accuracy and incomplete data collection, which can complicate fault determination and insurance claims.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that detects vehicle accidents and immediately generates and issues data gathering recommendations using a machine learning model, prompting individuals to collect initial and additional accident data, such as photographs and witness statements, to compile into an insurance claim package.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional retrospective methods are used for accident documentation, then the process is simple and requires minimal resources, but the accuracy of fault determination deteriorates and data collection becomes incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of fault determinationVSAvoidcompleteness of accident data
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically detecting accidents through sensor data and immediately generating data gathering recommendations before the scene changes. This proactive approach ensures evidence is captured while still fresh and available, preventing information loss that occurs with retrospective methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by analyzing initially gathered accident data and automatically generating additional data gathering recommendations based on identified gaps. This iterative feedback loop continues until comprehensive data is collected, ensuring complete and accurate fault determination information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If immediate automated data collection is implemented, then the accuracy and completeness of accident data improve, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of accident dataVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting accidents, analyzing gathered data, generating appropriate recommendations, and managing the entire data collection workflow without human intervention. This automation reduces the need for complex manual coordination while maintaining high data completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the data collection process into distinct phases: automatic accident detection, initial data gathering, analysis of initial data, generation of additional recommendations, and final compilation. This segmentation manages complexity by breaking down the overall system into manageable, independent modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of time

If retrospective accident investigation is used, then the resource requirements are low, but the time required for fault determination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for fault determinationVSAvoidefficiency of accident processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data collection and analysis actions immediately upon accident detection, preparing comprehensive fault determination information in advance. This eliminates the time delay associated with retrospective investigations, as all necessary data is gathered and analyzed before the investigation process begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous useful action by automatically and continuously gathering accident data from multiple sources, analyzing it, and generating recommendations without interruption. This continuous process eliminates idle time and delays inherent in retrospective methods, significantly improving processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12282963B1Automatedly generating and issuing accident data gathering recommendations following a vehicle accident
Publication Date: 2025.04.22 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA)
  • US12282963B1 patent drawing
  • US12282963B1 patent drawing
  • US12282963B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems described herein are directed to automatedly generating and issuing accident data gathering recommendations for a vehicle accident occurrence. In response to a recommendation system detecting an occurrence of a vehicle accident, the system can retrieve initial accident data for the occurrence. Using the initial accident data, the system can generate accident data gathering recommendations to obtain additional accident data via mapping to one or more characteristics for the vehicle accident occurrence. The recommendations, when executed, can yield additional accident data that can be compiled with the initial accident data into a vehicle accident evidence package.