Onboard Accident Reconstruction System Using Sensor Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The process of reporting and processing vehicle accidents is often inaccurate and time-consuming due to human forgetfulness or mental/physical states of drivers, leading to delays and additional costs for both insurance providers and drivers.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing vehicle sensors, including cameras, to detect accidents and generate animated videos or 3D models of the incident, which can be used to assess damage and modify vehicle control systems to mitigate further damage, while providing accurate information for insurance claims.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a driver manually reports accident details to an insurance carrier, then the insurance process can be initiated, but the reporting process is time-consuming and prone to inaccuracies due to human forgetfulness or mental/physical state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of accident reportingVSAvoidprocessing time for accident claims
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by continuously monitoring vehicle sensors (cameras, accelerometers, microphones) before an accident occurs, so that when an accident happens, the data is already captured and ready for immediate processing. This eliminates the time delay of manual reporting and ensures accurate data collection regardless of the driver's state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital copy of the accident scene through sensor data (videos, images, audio recordings, sensor readings) that accurately reproduces the accident events. This copy replaces the need for human memory and manual description, providing precise and objective accident documentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If a driver provides accident details manually, then the insurance carrier can process the claim, but the driver may forget or misremember details leading to inaccurate understanding of the accident

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of accident informationVSAvoidloss of accurate accident details
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a digital copy of the accident scene through sensor data (videos, images, audio recordings, sensor readings) that accurately reproduces the accident events. This copy replaces the need for human memory and manual description, providing precise and objective accident documentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to the driver by presenting the captured sensor data (videos, images, audio) back to them for verification. This allows the driver to confirm the accuracy of the recorded information, ensuring that the accident details are reliably captured before submission to the insurance carrier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If multiple inspections and manual assessments are conducted to verify accident details, then accurate damage assessment can be achieved, but additional costs and delays are incurred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of damage assessmentVSAvoidclaim processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a digital copy of the accident scene and vehicle damage through sensor data (images, videos, 3D models) that can be remotely analyzed. This eliminates the need for multiple physical inspections while maintaining accurate damage assessment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical process of multiple physical inspections with automated sensor-based data collection and digital analysis. The sensor data (images, videos, 3D models) can be processed remotely and efficiently, substituting the need for repeated physical examinations of the vehicle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive sensor monitoring and animation generation systems are implemented, then accurate accident reconstruction is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of accident reconstructionVSAvoidcomplexity of monitoring and reconstruction system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses universal multi-functional sensors (cameras, accelerometers, microphones, GPS) that serve multiple purposes: monitoring vehicle operation, detecting accidents, capturing accident scenes, and tracking vehicle location. This reduces the need for specialized dedicated sensors and simplifies the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer (the onboard computer and animation generation software) that consolidates data from multiple sensors and transforms it into a coherent accident reconstruction. This intermediary manages the complexity by providing a unified interface between diverse sensors and the final output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11620862B1Method and system for reconstructing information about an accident
Publication Date: 2023.04.04 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA)
  • US11620862B1 patent drawing
  • US11620862B1 patent drawing
  • US11620862B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for reconstructing information about vehicular accidents is disclosed. The system comprises an onboard computing system in a vehicle with an accident reconstruction system. Using sensed information from vehicle sensors and an animation engine, the system can generate animated videos depicting the accident. The system can also take action in response to information it learns from the animated video and/or an underlying 3D model of the accident used to generate the video.