Automated Account Sharing Detection and Remediation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations face revenue loss and security breaches due to authorized users sharing access credentials, which existing technologies address inadequately through manual and inefficient methods.

Innovation Solution

An automated system detects unauthorized sharing and implements escalating remediation actions, such as pop-up alerts, email notices, strong authentication, and password changes, without human intervention, based on predefined rules and user account history.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual methods are used to detect and respond to account sharing, then human judgment can be applied to each case, but the process is costly, slow, and less deterministic

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveManual judgment capabilityVSAvoidResponse speed and cost efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation where the account access system automatically detects sharing violations and applies remediation actions without requiring manual human intervention for each case. The system serves itself by monitoring account usage patterns, identifying unauthorized sharing, and executing predetermined remediation workflows autonomously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters from manual case-by-case handling to automated rule-based processing. By transforming the detection and response mechanism into an automated system with configurable parameters (detection thresholds, remediation levels, escalation rules), the system achieves both speed and determinism while maintaining operational effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If automated remediation is implemented, then response speed and consistency improve, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAutomated response speedVSAvoidSystem automation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated remediation system is segmented into distinct modular components: detection module, analysis module, remediation module, and escalation module. Each component performs a specific function independently, making the overall complex system manageable through functional segmentation and reducing the cognitive load required to understand and maintain the entire system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements preliminary action by establishing predetermined remediation workflows and escalation rules before violations occur. Detection thresholds, remediation actions, and escalation criteria are configured in advance, allowing the automated system to respond immediately upon detecting sharing behavior without requiring complex real-time decision-making logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If aggressive remediation actions are taken immediately, then unauthorized sharing is stopped quickly, but legitimate user disruption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSharing prevention effectivenessVSAvoidUser access convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The remediation system is dynamic and adaptive, adjusting the severity of actions based on the specific situation. It monitors account usage patterns continuously and escalates or de-escalates remediation measures based on whether sharing behavior persists. This dynamic approach allows the system to be aggressive when necessary while being lenient when legitimate users experience temporary issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where remediation actions are monitored for their effectiveness. If a remediation action appears to be disrupting legitimate users without stopping sharing, the system adjusts its approach based on feedback from continued monitoring. This feedback mechanism ensures that aggressive actions are taken only when necessary and that user convenience is preserved when possible

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8856955B2Remediating unauthorized sharing of account access to online resources
Publication Date: 2014.10.07 CONCENTRIX SREV INC
  • US8856955B2 patent drawing
  • US8856955B2 patent drawing
  • US8856955B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A number of effective alternatives for discouraging unauthorized online-resource sharing are discussed. An anti-sharing strategy can be built by applying one or more of the alternatives in response to possible, strongly-suspected or virtually certain unauthorized sharing.