Account Validation via Machine Learning Fake Product Differentiation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing account validation systems lack an efficient method to differentiate between actual and fake products based on user purchase history, particularly in loyalty programs, which complicates the validation process and user experience in linking in-store accounts with online e-commerce platforms.

Innovation Solution

An account validation system that includes a user device and an account validation server, which stores order purchase history, generates fake products using machine learning based on user preferences, and prompts the user to differentiate between purchased and fake products, thereby validating the account upon correct identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional account validation methods are used, then the validation process is simple, but the system cannot effectively differentiate between actual and fake products based on user purchase history

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct differentiation accuracyVSAvoidvalidation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-generates fake products that match the user's purchase history patterns before validation occurs. This preliminary preparation of test data enables accurate product differentiation during validation without adding complexity to the actual validation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies (fake products) of actual purchased products by analyzing purchase history patterns. These synthetic copies replicate the characteristics of real products the user has bought, enabling validation through differentiation tasks without requiring physical product samples.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If machine learning is used to generate fake products based on user preferences, then account validation accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccount validation reliabilityVSAvoidvalidation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model generates fake products and analyzes purchase history patterns before the validation process begins. This pre-computation reduces the time required during actual validation, as the complex analytical work is completed in advance when computational resources are more readily available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the user's own purchase history data to generate the fake products needed for validation. This self-service approach eliminates the need for external databases or additional data sources, reducing processing time and computational overhead by leveraging already-available information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system prompts users to differentiate between purchased and fake products, then validation security is enhanced, but user experience complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation securityVSAvoiduser operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates realistic copies of products the user has actually purchased, making the differentiation task intuitive and familiar. Since the fake products are based on real items from the user's purchase history, the validation process feels natural rather than artificial, improving ease of operation while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system varies parameters of the fake products (such as brand, price, or specific attributes) while maintaining overall similarity to purchased items. This creates a subtle differentiation challenge that is secure yet intuitive for the user to resolve, balancing security requirements with user experience simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11354679B1Account validation system and related methods
Publication Date: 2022.06.07 INMAR CLEARING INC
  • US11354679B1 patent drawing
  • US11354679B1 patent drawing
  • US11354679B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An account validation system may include an account validation server. The server may store an order purchase history for accounts. The order purchase history may include a purchased product. The server may obtain an account identifier from a user device for a given user and communicate the purchased product to the user device for display thereon based upon a corresponding account associated with the account identifier. The server may communicate a fake product that is inconsistent with the order purchase history to the user device and based upon the order purchase history for the corresponding account. The server may also cooperate to prompt the given user to differentiate the purchased product from the fake product, and determine, based upon the user device, whether the given user has differentiated the purchased product from the fake product, and when so, validate the corresponding account.