Modular Acetabular Cage Assembly for Adjustable Flange Orientation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current acetabular prostheses face challenges in matching patient anatomy due to fixed flange orientations, requiring surgeons to force alignment, and the need for separate left and right cages, limiting surgical flexibility and ease of use.
Innovation Solution
An acetabular cage design with separate superior and inferior flanges, allowing for variable orientation and assembly with an acetabular cup using apex fasteners, and optional perforations for partial use, enabling intraoperative adjustments and rigid attachment.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of manufacture
If fixed flange orientations are used in acetabular cages, then manufacturing is simplified, but adaptability to patient anatomy is reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The acetabular cage is divided into separate superior and inferior flange components that can be independently oriented and assembled, allowing each flange to be customized to match patient anatomy while maintaining standardized manufacturing processes for each component
Solution Approach 2:
The cage design allows for dynamic adjustment of flange orientations during surgery through modular assembly with apex fasteners, enabling surgeons to adapt the implant configuration to match the specific anatomical requirements of each patient
2Manufacturing precision
If separate left and right acetabular cages are provided, then anatomical precision is improved, but device complexity and inventory requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
A universal acetabular cage design with modular superior and inferior flanges can be configured for both left and right hip applications, eliminating the need for separate left and right-specific cages while maintaining anatomical precision through adjustable flange orientations
3Ease of operation
If the inferior flange is removed to simplify the cage structure, then ease of operation is improved, but structural stability may be compromised
Solution Approach 1:
The cage design allows surgeons to use only the superior flange when anatomical conditions permit, simplifying the procedure, while retaining the option to add the inferior flange when additional structural support is needed, providing flexibility without compromising stability
Data Source
Figure 1A~1B
Figure 1C
Figure 2A~2B
AI summary
Prostheses, acetabular apparatuses, and methods of use are disclosed. In some embodiments, an acetabular apparatus includes an acetabular cup and an acetabular cage disposed within an interior of the acetabular cup. The acetabular cage may include a central portion including a first section and a second section rotatably coupled together, and a first flange extending from the first section and a second flange extending from the second section. The acetabular prosthesis may further include a fastener extending through each of the acetabular cup and the central portion of the acetabular cage.