Acetal-Protected Sugar Synthesis with Recyclable Solid Acid Catalysts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for preparing acetal-protected sugars require constant addition and neutralization of homogeneous acids, which is not favorable for large-scale processing due to additional costs and waste management, and they suffer from low yield and selectivity.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the reaction of sugars or sugar derivatives with an aldehyde in the presence of a heterogeneous acidic catalyst, allowing for the formation of acetal-protected sugars, which can be recycled and used in continuous flow reactors, enhancing yield and selectivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If homogeneous acidic catalyst is used for preparing acetal-protected sugars, then the reaction can proceed, but constant addition and neutralization is required which increases operational complexity and waste management burden

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A solid support material acts as an intermediary carrier for the acidic catalyst, allowing the catalyst to be immobilized on a solid matrix. This enables the catalyst to remain stationary in the reactor while still facilitating the reaction, eliminating the need for continuous addition and neutralization steps. The solid support with porous structure provides high surface area for catalyst dispersion while enabling easy separation from the reaction mixture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The heterogeneous catalyst system is designed to be self-regenerating through continuous circulation between reaction and regeneration zones. The catalyst automatically undergoes reaction, deactivation, and regeneration cycles without external intervention, reducing operational complexity. The solid support structure enables the catalyst to self-separate from the reaction mixture and be regenerated in situ.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If homogeneous acidic catalyst is used for preparing acetal-protected sugars, then the reaction can proceed, but additional costs and waste management are incurred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidwaste generation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The solid support-catalyst system is designed for repeated use over multiple reaction cycles. After deactivation, the catalyst is regenerated in situ by heating in an inert atmosphere to burn off carbon deposits, restoring activity without requiring disposal. This recovery-regeneration cycle eliminates waste generation and reduces operational costs associated with continuous catalyst replacement and neutralization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The deactivation of the catalyst through carbon deposition is converted from a harmful effect into a beneficial regeneration opportunity. The controlled burning off of carbon deposits during regeneration not only restores catalyst activity but also serves as a self-cleaning process, eliminating the need for separate waste treatment steps and converting what would be waste into a useful regeneration mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Productivity

If conventional methods are used for preparing acetal-protected sugars, then the reaction can proceed, but yield and selectivity are low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield and selectivityVSAvoidproduct selectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The acidic catalyst sites are locally concentrated on the solid support surface within the porous structure, creating high local activity zones. This localized catalysis enhances reaction efficiency and selectivity by concentrating active sites where they are most needed, while the porous structure controls mass transport to favor desired product formation. The local environment within the pores can be optimized for specific reaction pathways, improving both yield and selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves higher yields and selectivity of acetal-protected sugars while reducing waste and operational costs, enabling large-scale production and providing green polar aprotic solvents and biobased products like xylitol and biobased surfactants.

Implementation Method 1

reacting a sugar or a sugar derivative with an aldehyde or an aldehyde source in the presence of a heterogeneous acidic catalyst to form the at least partially acetal-protected sugar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS20260008802A1Method for preparing an at least partially acetal-protected sugar
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FEDERALE DE LAUSANNE (EPFL)
  • US20260008802A1 patent drawing
  • US20260008802A1 patent drawing
  • US20260008802A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for preparing an at least partially acetal-protected sugar involving the step of reacting a sugar or a sugar derivative selected from the group consisting of an aldopentose, an aldohexose, an aldopentoside and an aldohexoside with an aldehyde or an aldehyde source in the presence of heterogeneous acidic catalyst to form the at least partially acetal-protected sugar selected from the group consisting of a compound of formula (I), (II), (III), (IV), (V), (VI), (VII), (VIII), (IX), (X,)(XI) and (XII) wherein R1, R1′, R2, R2′, R3, R3′, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, and R12′ are Y or Z-E, and wherein R1 and R1′, R2 and R2′, R3 and R3′, and R12 and R12′ are the same or different from each other and Y is hydrogen or a linear, branched or cyclic hydrocarbon moiety having 1 to 20 carbon 69 atoms, Z is a linear, branched or cyclic hydrocarbon moiety with 0 to 12 carbon atoms, optionally substituted with 1 to 4 C1 to C4 alkyl groups, 1 to 4 halogen atoms, or benzyl groups and E is —COOH, —CH(COOH)2, —COOR19, —CH(COOR20)(COOR21), —CHO, —CH(CHO)2, —C2H3, CH(C2H3)2, —CHCHR22, —CHCR23R24, —C2H, —C2R25, —N3, —NH2, —CH(NH2)2, —NHR26, —CH(NHR27)(NHR28), —NR29R30, —CH(NR31R32)(NR33R34), —OH, —OR35, —CH(R36OH)(R37OH), and R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, R30, R31, R32, R33, R34, and R35, are independent from each other C1 to C20 alkyl, and R20 and R21, R23 and R24, R27 and R28, R29 and R30, R31 and R32, as well as R33 and R34 are the same or different from each other, and R36 and R37 are independent from each other absent or a linear or branched C1 to C12 hydrocarbon chain and R13, R14, R15, R16, R17 and R18 are independent from each other hydrogen or a linear, branched or cyclic hydrocarbon moiety having 1 to 20 carbon atoms.