ACH Control Total Reevaluation Across Multiple Processing Channels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current ACH transaction processing systems face inefficiencies and resource wastage due to the manual review and delay caused by the lack of timely control total information, leading to suspended ACH data files that cannot be processed until matching control totals are received.

Innovation Solution

An automated system and method for reevaluating control total information by creating an exception table to store suspended ACH data files, allowing automatic matching with subsequently received control totals, and resuming processing at a subsequent batch operation, thereby avoiding manual intervention and resource consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual review is performed for ACH data files with missing control totals, then fraud prevention is maintained, but processing efficiency deteriorates and resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud preventionVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated self-verification by reevaluating control totals from multiple communication channels. The processor automatically retrieves and compares control totals without requiring manual intervention, allowing the system to service itself while maintaining fraud prevention through multi-channel verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary reevaluation of control totals before final processing approval. By proactively checking multiple communication channels for control total information before committing to processing, the system prevents fraud while avoiding the need for manual review during actual processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If ACH data files are suspended due to missing control totals, then processing accuracy is maintained, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous processing operations by implementing automated reevaluation that occurs without interrupting the overall processing flow. While individual files may be temporarily suspended for verification, the processing system continues operating with other files, and the suspended files are automatically resumed once control totals are verified from multiple channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring communication channels for control total information. When control totals are initially missing, the system suspends processing but immediately begins querying alternative channels, using the feedback from these queries to determine whether to resume or reject the file, thereby reducing unnecessary time losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple communication channels are used for control total verification, then fraud prevention is enhanced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud preventionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processor is designed with multi-functionality to handle multiple communication channels through a single unified interface. The same processing logic and verification mechanisms are applied across different channels, allowing the system to enhance fraud prevention through multi-channel verification without proportionally increasing complexity, as the core verification function serves multiple purposes and channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If automated reevaluation is implemented, then processing efficiency is improved, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidprocessor and memory resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial reevaluation by selectively rechecking control totals only for files that initially failed verification, rather than reevaluating all files. This approach improves processing efficiency for problematic files while avoiding the excessive resource consumption that would result from universally reevaluating every transaction, thus balancing efficiency gains with resource conservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12572979B2Electronic transaction automated control total reevaluation across multiple channels
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 TRUIST BANK
  • US12572979B2 patent drawing
  • US12572979B2 patent drawing
  • US12572979B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for automatic control total reevaluation during batch processing of ACH data files, such that control total information received by an originating financial institution after an attempted batch processing operation on an associated ACH data file can still be automatically matched with the already received associated ACH data file, the ACH data file can be appropriately modified to reflect receipt of the matching control total information, and the ACH data file can be processed at a subsequent scheduled batch processing operation.