Expedited ACH Funds Transfer via Routing Number Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing regulatory waiting periods for Automated Clearing House (ACH) electronic funds transfers are excessively long, leading to user dissatisfaction due to delayed transaction processing, despite modern financial institutions' capabilities.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method where, upon receiving a negative return code for a transaction associated with a specific financial institution routing number, all other transactions with the same routing number are marked as accepted and released immediately, bypassing the standard waiting period, using a computer system to manage and expedite electronic funds transfers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the regulatory waiting period is enforced to ensure sufficient time for fund verification, then transaction reliability is improved, but transaction processing speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction reliabilityVSAvoidtransaction processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by initiating multiple transactions with different routing numbers simultaneously before the regulatory waiting period expires. When a negative return code is received for one transaction, the system has already submitted alternative transactions that can be expedited, thus preparing advance alternatives to maintain both reliability and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism using multiple ACH routing numbers as alternative pathways. When one routing number fails or requires waiting, the system can switch to another routing number that may provide faster clearance, acting as a mediator to balance verification reliability with processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the regulatory waiting period is enforced to verify sufficient funds, then risk of insufficient funds is reduced, but user satisfaction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk mitigationVSAvoiduser satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by submitting multiple transactions with different routing numbers before the waiting period expires. This preliminary diversification allows the system to potentially expedite alternative transactions when failures occur, reducing the perceived waiting time for users while maintaining fund verification through the initial transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by varying the ACH routing numbers across multiple transactions. This parameter diversification creates different processing pathways with potentially different clearance times, allowing the system to optimize between risk mitigation and user satisfaction by selecting routing numbers that balance these competing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If multiple transactions are initiated with different routing numbers to expedite processing, then transaction speed is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction clearance speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies segmentation by dividing the single transaction into multiple transactions with different routing numbers. This segmentation allows parallel processing through multiple channels, improving overall clearance speed while managing complexity through systematic organization of the segmented transaction paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves universality by making the transaction initiation process multi-functional, capable of operating through multiple routing numbers simultaneously. This multi-functionality allows the same transaction logic to serve multiple purposes: verification through one routing number and expedited processing through another, reducing the need for separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Manufacturing precision

If the standard waiting period is maintained for all transactions, then processing accuracy is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing accuracyVSAvoidtransaction throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by initiating multiple transactions before the standard waiting period expires. When a negative return code is received, alternative transactions are already in progress or can be expedited immediately, allowing the system to maintain accurate verification through the initial transactions while achieving higher productivity through expedited alternatives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by submitting only the necessary number of alternative transactions with different routing numbers rather than exhaustively trying all possible routing numbers. This partial approach achieves sufficient productivity improvement while maintaining processing accuracy, avoiding excessive complexity from attempting all possible pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8688580B1Expediting electronic funds transfers
Publication Date: 2014.04.01 PAYPAL INC
  • US8688580B1 patent drawing
  • US8688580B1 patent drawing
  • US8688580B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment, a method comprises initiating a plurality of electronic funds transfer transactions using an automated clearing house (ACH) operator, wherein each of the transactions is associated with one of a plurality of financial institution routing numbers; receiving a negative return code for a particular transaction that is associated with a particular financial institution routing number; in response to receiving the negative return code for the particular transaction and the particular financial institution routing number, and without waiting for an end of a waiting time period specified in one or more financial regulations: marking, as accepted, all other transactions in the plurality that are associated with the same particular financial institution routing number; releasing the marked transactions.