Acid Precooking Corn Flour Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing pregelatinized corn flours result in excessive pregelatinization and denaturation, leading to high costs, poor texture, and quality limitations in cereal-based snacks, and fail to efficiently produce ultrafine and fine corn flours for dairy-based and cereal-based foods while generating significant wastewater and solid losses.

Innovation Solution

An acid precooking process using sulfites as a processing aid for partial hydrolysis of insoluble fiber and starch, combined with centrifugal air separation to control starch pregelatinization and protein denaturation, reducing kernel washing and solid losses, and achieving uniform partial cooking for efficient production of ultrafine and fine corn flours.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If conventional alkaline cooking and washing processes are used to produce nixtamalized corn flour, then pericarp removal is achieved, but excessive fiber remains in the final product and significant solid losses occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolid lossesVSAvoidfiber content control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the cooking process by using acid (pH 3.0-5.0) instead of conventional alkali, and controls temperature (70-90°C) and time (15-60 minutes) to achieve selective hydrolysis of insoluble fiber while preserving starch and protein, thereby reducing fiber content in the final product without excessive solid losses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical washing process with chemical hydrolysis using acid treatment, which selectively degrades insoluble fiber in the pericarp without requiring extensive washing, thereby reducing both solid losses and fiber content in the final flour product

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If excessive pregelatinization and denaturation occur during cooking, then cooking efficiency is improved, but product quality and texture deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking efficiencyVSAvoidproduct quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial hydrolysis by controlling acid concentration (0.1-1.0% v/v) and treatment time (15-60 minutes) to achieve only the desired degree of fiber breakdown without excessive pregelatinization or protein denaturation, maintaining optimal product quality while improving cooking efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses pH control (maintaining pH 3.0-5.0 during treatment) as a feedback mechanism to monitor and control the hydrolysis process, ensuring that fiber degradation occurs to the appropriate extent while preventing excessive cooking that would damage starch and protein quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If traditional milling and separation processes are used, then flour production is achieved, but ultrafine and fine corn flours cannot be efficiently produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflour production efficiencyVSAvoidflour fineness control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses air classification (pneumatic separation) to efficiently separate ultrafine, fine, and coarse flour fractions based on particle size and density, enabling high-efficiency production of specific flour fineness grades that traditional mechanical milling cannot achieve

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

4Quantity of substance

If sulfiting reducing agents are used during steeping, then starch extraction is improved, but excessive pregelatinization and protein denaturation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestarch extractionVSAvoidprotein denaturation control
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical environment from reducing agents to acid treatment at controlled pH (3.0-5.0) and temperature (70-90°C), which achieves starch gelatinization and fiber hydrolysis without causing excessive protein denaturation, thereby maintaining protein quality while improving starch extraction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process results in higher nutritional value corn flours with reduced wastewater and solid losses, improved texture, and increased yield of ultrafine and fine corn flours, suitable for dairy-based and cereal-based foods, while minimizing wastewater generation and operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

achieves continuous partial hydrolysis of insoluble fiber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 2

centrifugal separating and recovering the ultrafine grind

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal separation: Centrifugal Separation

Data Source

PatentEP1887884B1Continuous production of pregelatinized corn flours for dairy-based and cereal-based foods
Publication Date: 2017.05.24 GRUMA S A B DE CV
  • EP1887884B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

A process and apparatus for the continuous production of pregelatinized corn flours for dairy-based and cereal-based foods, includes an acid precooking with a sodium metabisulfite, or sodium hydrogen sulfite or sodium sulfite solution as a food processing aid for partial hydrolysis of insoluble fiber, starch and protein, along with a controlled pregelatinization and denaturation, kernel washing , stabilizing moisture content for grinding, milling and drying preconditioned kernel to produce a partial gelatinization, cooling and drying the dry-ground particle, separation and recovery of the ultrafine grind from the coarser grind while the latter is further aspirated to remove a light corn bran and further reground to produce bran flour, remilling and sieving the isolated coarser grind to obtain fine corn flour for cereal-based foods, and admixing only fine flour with lime to produce a masa flour. An ultrafine corn flour is used as an aid or adjuvant flour for dairy-based foods.