Acid Stimulation Treatment Fluids With Microemulsion Retardation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hydrocarbon reservoir stimulation methods in carbonate formations face challenges such as brine retention, polymer-induced plugging, and surfactant incompatibilities, leading to reduced production efficiency and increased fluid volumes.

Innovation Solution

A treatment fluid comprising an aqueous acid solution with a retardation additive, including oleaginous liquids, fatty alkyl alcohol ethoxylates, and compatible surfactants, which forms stable microemulsions to enhance fluid recovery and reduce surface tension, allowing deeper matrix penetration and lower fluid volumes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a polymer is used to facilitate foaming in stimulation fluid, then fluid production is improved, but polymer loading may plug porosity within the carbonate reservoir

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid productionVSAvoidporosity plugging
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the polymer component from the stimulation fluid formulation entirely, replacing it with a surfactant-based foaming system. This extraction eliminates the porosity plugging problem while maintaining foam generation capabilities through alternative chemical mechanisms that do not require high molecular weight polymers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple functions into the surfactant system: foam generation, surface tension reduction, and fluid flow facilitation. By merging these functions into a single chemical class without polymer additives, the system achieves productivity improvement without the harmful porosity plugging effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Stability of the object's composition

If high surface tension values are used in stimulation fluid, then fluid stability is maintained, but fluid production is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid stabilityVSAvoidfluid production
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the surface tension parameter from high to low values by incorporating surfactants in optimized concentrations. This parameter change enables improved fluid production through better wetting and flow characteristics while the surfactant system itself provides sufficient stability to maintain composition integrity under reservoir conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If large volumes of stimulation fluid are used to account for surfactant degradation, then surfactant performance variability is addressed, but treatment fluid volume increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurfactant performanceVSAvoidstimulation fluid volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite surfactant system comprising multiple surfactant types working synergistically. This composite approach enhances overall surfactant performance and reliability under high temperature and pressure conditions, reducing the need for excessive fluid volumes to compensate for individual surfactant degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Adaptability or versatility

If conventional surfactants are used in high temperature carbonate reservoirs, then emulsification may be promoted, but surfactant incompatibility with acids and each other occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemulsification capabilityVSAvoidsurfactant compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent selects surfactants with specific local qualities - particular hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) values and molecular structures - that are optimized for high temperature stability and acid compatibility. This localized optimization of surfactant properties ensures both emulsification capability and compatibility with the acidic reservoir environment without degradation or precipitation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution improves hydrocarbon production by stabilizing emulsions under carbonate reservoir conditions, reducing brine retention, and enabling efficient acid retardation, thus increasing permeability and recovery while minimizing treatment fluid volumes.

Implementation Method 1

forms stable microemulsions to enhance fluid recovery and reduce surface tension

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMicroemulsion: Microemulsion

Implementation Method 2

reduce surface tension, allowing deeper matrix penetration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface tension reduction: Surface Tension

Implementation Method 3

mineral acids or organic acids are used to dissolve a portion of the carbonate matrix to form passages (wormholes)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDissolution: Solvation

Implementation Method 4

Foaming may be utilized to facilitate production of stimulation fluids following an acidizing operation or an acid fracturing operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFoam formation: Foam

Data Source

PatentUS12435263B2Treatment fluids for acid stimulation operations and methods related thereto
Publication Date: 2025.10.07 SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO
  • US12435263B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Treatment fluids for acid stimulation operations and methods related thereto. Treatment fluids comprise: an aqueous acid solution comprising a mineral acid and an organic acid; and a retardation additive comprising: 1-15 wt % of an oleaginous liquid; 5-30 wt % of a fatty alkyl alcohol ethoxylate; 2-40 wt % of at least one of a fatty alkyl ethoxylated ammonium salt, a zwitterionic surfactant, an alkyl ether sulfate salt, or an alkyl ether sulfonate salt; 4-30 wt % of a co-solvent; and 10-85 wt % of an aqueous fluid, each wt % based on a total mass of the retardation additive. Treatment fluids or retardation additives may be oil-in-water emulsions. Treatment fluids may have 0.5-5 gallons per thousand, based on an overall volume of the treatment fluid of the retardation additive. Methods comprise providing and introducing the treatment fluid into a subterranean formation during a stimulation operation.