Acidic pH Immunoassay for Protein A Quantification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for quantifying protein A in fluid samples, especially when it is in complex form with IgG, face challenges due to limited access to epitopes, leading to inaccurate concentration estimates and potential contamination issues during purification processes, which can result in unwanted side effects during therapeutic protein administration.

Innovation Solution

A method involving separate acidic pH steps for dissociating preformed protein A-IgG complexes, followed by an immunoassay at a pH that prevents reformation of complexes, allowing for accurate quantification of protein A using a ligand capable of specific binding, even in the presence of large amounts of complexing components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If protein A is quantified in complex form with IgG using conventional immunoassays, then the assay can be performed under physiological conditions, but the measurement precision deteriorates due to limited access to epitopes on complexed protein A

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassay reliabilityVSAvoidconcentration estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by shifting the pH from physiological conditions (pH 7.4) to acidic conditions (pH 2.0-3.0) to dissociate protein A-IgG complexes. This pH change disrupts the non-covalent interactions maintaining the complex, freeing epitopes on protein A for antibody binding and enabling accurate quantification of total protein A including previously complexed forms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If affinity purification is performed using protein A immobilized on resin, then the purification efficiency is improved, but the harmful factors increase due to ligand leaching and contamination of the purified product

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurification efficiencyVSAvoidligand leaching contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the conventional affinity purification method with acid-based dissociation. Instead of relying on protein A-IgG binding at physiological pH, the method uses acidic conditions (pH 2.0-3.0) to dissociate complexes and release IgG from the protein A resin, preventing ligand leaching contamination while maintaining purification efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the pH parameter from physiological conditions to acidic conditions during the purification process. This parameter change prevents ligand leaching by disrupting the binding interaction between protein A and IgG, thereby eliminating contamination of the purified therapeutic protein with leached ligand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If conventional immunoassays are used to detect protein A, then the ease of operation is maintained, but the measurement precision deteriorates when protein A is present in complex form with antibodies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassay simplicityVSAvoidquantification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the assay conditions by changing the pH parameter to acidic conditions (pH 2.0-3.0). This single parameter change achieves both complex dissociation and maintains assay functionality, preserving ease of operation while dramatically improving measurement precision for total protein A quantification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables precise determination of protein A concentrations at sub-ppm levels, reducing the risk of unwanted side effects by ensuring accurate quantification and minimizing complex reformation, thus improving the safety and efficacy of therapeutic protein purification.

Implementation Method 1

subjecting the sample to a first acidic pH in the range from about 1.5 to about 3.2 to at least substantially dissociate any analyte complex present

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic interaction disruption:

Implementation Method 2

subjecting the sample to a first acidic pH in the range from about 1.5 to about 3.2 to at least substantially dissociate any analyte complex present and provide substantially all analyte in free form

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProtein denaturation:

Implementation Method 3

determining the binding of analyte to the ligand to quantitatively determine the analyte in the sample, wherein the ligand is capable of specifically binding to the analyte

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAntigen-antibody binding:

Data Source

PatentEP2904393B1Method and kit for analyte determination at acidic conditions
Publication Date: 2018.11.28 GYROS
  • EP2904393B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2904393B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2904393B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of quantitatively determining an analyte in a fluid sample by an immunoassay comprises binding of the analyte to a ligand capable of specifically binding to the analyte, wherein at least part of the analyte is present as an analyte complex is disclosed. The method comprises the steps of: a) subjecting the sample to a first acidic pH to at least substantially dissociate any analyte complex present and provide substantially all analyte in free form, b) raising the first acidic pH to a second acidic pH where re-formation of complexes is prevented but where binding of analyte to the ligand is permitted, and c) determining the binding of analyte to the ligand to quantitatively determine the analyte in the sample.