Electronic Lock Box with Acme Drive Screw and Two-State Latching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic lock boxes face vulnerabilities to attacks using simple tools and external forces, and they inefficiently use battery power due to high power consumption and frictional losses in their mechanical systems.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a two-state locking system with sloped surfaces and blocking members that provide enhanced security against external forces and a high drive ratio using an Acme drive screw to minimize friction and optimize power usage, allowing the lock box to operate effectively in low battery conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If a traditional spur gear motor system is used to drive the movable actuator, then the device can operate with simple mechanics, but it suffers from high frictional losses and excessive power consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidfrictional losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional spur gear mechanical transmission system with an Acme power screw mechanism. This substitution eliminates the high-friction gear teeth engagement and uses a threaded screw that converts rotational motion to linear motion with significantly reduced frictional losses, directly addressing the energy efficiency problem

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the mechanical parameters of the drive system by using an Acme thread profile with specific lead and pitch dimensions. This parameter change optimizes the mechanical advantage and reduces the friction coefficient compared to gear systems, enabling lower power consumption while maintaining the required driving force

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a single-state latch system is used, then the device structure remains simple, but it provides insufficient security against attacks using simple tools and external forces

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidlatching system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the latching system into two distinct functional states: a first state for normal operation and a second state for enhanced security. This segmentation allows each state to be optimized for its specific purpose while maintaining overall system manageability despite the increased complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic latching system where the movable actuator can be positioned at different locations to achieve different locking states. The system transitions between states based on operational requirements, providing adaptability and enhanced security without requiring a completely static complex structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Force

If the movable actuator uses perpendicular sloped surfaces, then the mechanical advantage is maximized, but it creates excessive friction and requires more power to operate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical advantageVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the angular parameter of the sloped surfaces from perpendicular (90 degrees) to non-perpendicular angles. This parameter modification reduces the normal force between contacting surfaces, thereby reducing friction while maintaining sufficient mechanical advantage for the latching function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The enhanced security and power efficiency result in greater resistance to unauthorized access and prolonged battery life, even in extreme cold conditions, without significant cost increases.

Implementation Method 1

a high drive ratio using an Acme drive screw to minimize friction and optimize power usage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcme screw mechanism: Screw

Implementation Method 2

a movable actuator having first and second spaced-apart pairs of sloped surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSloped surface mechanical advantage: Inclined Plane

Data Source

PatentEP2313581B1Electronic lock box with mechanism immobilizer features
Publication Date: 2017.08.23 SENTRILOCK LLC
  • EP2313581B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2313581B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2313581B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

An electronic lock box contains a mechanical structure that allows the lock box to work in several different mechanical states. A first state is a key compartment door unlocking state, while a second state is a shackle release state. A third state is a 'soft lock' state, which allows the key compartment door to be closed, or the shackle to be re-installed, and once this has occurred, the door will not fall open, and the shackle will not fall out. A fourth state is a 'hard lock' state in which the key compartment door and the shackle are not easily disturbed by vibration or intentional impact by a would-be thief, who is attempting to unlawfully open the door or remove the shackle.