Acoustic Bead Extraction for Biomaterial Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current biomaterial separation techniques, such as those using magnetic beads, face challenges in specificity, efficiency, and scalability, particularly in complex mixtures like blood, where non-specific trapping and reagent costs are high.

Innovation Solution

The use of functionalized acoustic beads, which are trapped in an acoustic standing wave field, allowing for specific binding and separation of biomaterials like recombinant proteins, monoclonal antibodies, and cells without mechanical contact, using affinity chemistry similar to magnetic beads but with the advantage of acoustic field manipulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If magnetic beads are used for biomaterial separation, then separation can be achieved, but non-specific trapping occurs and reagent costs are high

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovespecificityVSAvoidreagent costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces magnetic beads with acoustic beads that utilize acoustic standing waves for separation. The acoustic beads are trapped at nodes of the acoustic field, enabling specific binding and separation of biomaterials without the non-specific trapping issues associated with magnetic beads. This substitution maintains separation capability while improving specificity and reducing reagent costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameter used for bead manipulation from magnetic field to acoustic field. By adjusting acoustic parameters such as frequency and intensity, the system achieves specific binding and separation of biomaterials with high reliability, while the acoustic beads can be removed more efficiently, reducing reagent losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If functionalized material is trapped by acoustic nodes, then contactless trapping is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontactless trappingVSAvoidacoustic field generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical trapping methods (channels, conduits, tweezers) with acoustic field-based trapping. The acoustic standing wave field creates nodes that naturally trap functionalized beads without mechanical contact, simplifying the operation and avoiding mechanical wear or damage. While acoustic field generation requires careful system design, the contactless nature eliminates complex mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If affinity chemistry is used for specific binding, then separation efficiency improves, but reagent costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidreagent costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies affinity chemistry to acoustic beads, enabling specific binding of biomaterials through functionalized surfaces. The acoustic field then facilitates the separation and recovery of bound materials. This combination achieves high separation efficiency through affinity interactions while the acoustic retrieval mechanism reduces reagent losses compared to traditional magnetic methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables efficient recovery of functionalized acoustic beads and bound biomaterials through acoustic field manipulation. The acoustic standing waves can be adjusted to release and recover materials from the beads, minimizing reagent losses and improving the overall efficiency of the separation process while maintaining affinity-based specificity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method achieves high specificity and efficiency in separating target biomaterials, as demonstrated by successful extraction of CD3+ T cells from blood, with potential for continuous processing and reduced reagent usage, matching or exceeding the performance of magnetic bead systems while being more versatile and biocompatible.

Implementation Method 1

The functionalized material, such as microcarriers that are coated with an affinity protein, is trapped by nodes and anti-nodes of an acoustic standing wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic radiation pressure: Acoustic Radiation Pressure

Implementation Method 2

functionalized material distributed in a fluid chamber that bind the specific target materials such as recombinant proteins and monoclonal antibodies or cells

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAffinity binding:

Data Source

PatentUS11420136B2Affinity cell extraction by acoustics
Publication Date: 2022.08.23 FLODESIGN SONICS INC
  • US11420136B2 patent drawing
  • US11420136B2 patent drawing
  • US11420136B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Beads with functionalized material applied to them are exposed to an acoustic field to trap or pass the beads. The beads may include or be free of ferro magnetic material. The beads may be biocompatible or biodegradable for a host. The size of the beads may vary over a range, and/or be heterogenous or homogenous. The composition of the beads may include high, neutral or low acoustic contrast material. The chemistry of the functionalized material may be compatible with existing processes.