Acoustic Feedback for Bone Cement Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for removing cement mantles during joint revision surgeries risk unnecessary bone removal, as they lack effective means to differentiate between cement and bone contact during drilling.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing real-time acoustic feedback to distinguish between the acoustic frequencies of cement and bone, automatically controlling the drill or bur to prevent further bone damage by stopping or retracting it when bone contact is detected.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a surgical drill or bur is used to remove cement mantle, then cement removal effectiveness is improved, but the risk of unnecessary bone removal increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecement removal precisionVSAvoidbone damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors acoustic signals generated during drilling and provides real-time feedback to distinguish between cement and bone contact. When the acoustic signature indicates bone contact, the system automatically stops the drill, preventing unnecessary bone removal while maintaining effective cement removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection and tactile feedback with an acoustic detection system that uses microphones and signal processing to identify material boundaries. This substitution enables more precise control and reduces the risk of human error in distinguishing cement from bone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If manual drilling control is used to remove cement, then operational simplicity is maintained, but measurement precision of material contact deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling operation simplicityVSAvoidcement vs bone contact detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows the drilling process to proceed manually until the acoustic feedback automatically indicates bone contact. The surgeon maintains control of the drilling action while the system independently monitors and stops the process when necessary, combining manual operation simplicity with automated precision detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The acoustic detection system acts as an intermediary between the surgeon's drilling action and the actual material removal. It provides real-time information about the drill-bone interface without interfering with the surgeon's manual control, bridging the gap between simple operation and precise measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If acoustic feedback system is implemented to detect bone contact, then bone protection is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone damage preventionVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors changes in acoustic parameters (frequency, amplitude, spectral characteristics) during drilling. By detecting specific parameter thresholds that indicate bone contact, the system can trigger automatic stop commands without requiring complex decision-making algorithms, thus balancing protection capability with system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Minimizes the removal of healthy bone by accurately differentiating between cement and bone contact, thereby reducing bone loss during revision surgeries.

Implementation Method 1

A system utilizing real-time acoustic feedback to distinguish between the acoustic frequencies of cement and bone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic feedback: Sound

Implementation Method 2

the resonance frequency of the specific cement mantle being drilled may be used to make this determination

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance frequency: Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS10194966B2Bone cement removal using real-time acoustic feedback
Publication Date: 2019.02.05 BLUE BELT TECH INC
  • US10194966B2 patent drawing
  • US10194966B2 patent drawing
  • US10194966B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for bone cement removal using real-time acoustic feedback, such as during a drilling process in a revision arthroplasty, are discussed. A system for bone cement removal may include a processor to perform operation comprising receiving digital frequency data from the microphone, comparing at least a portion of the digital frequency data to a plurality of frequency signatures, and determining, based at least in part on the comparing, whether the portion of the digital frequency data is representative of a cut bone frequency or a cut bone cement frequency.