Acoustic Control of Crystalline Particle Count

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for controlling the formation of crystalline particles in solutions are limited in precision and efficiency, particularly in regulating the number and size of particles formed, as they often rely on temperature and concentration thresholds that can be difficult to manage effectively.

Innovation Solution

The use of focused acoustic energy allows for the control of crystalline particle formation by adjusting the peak incident power (PIP), enabling the generation of crystalline particles at controlled rates and sizes even below the primary and secondary nucleation thresholds, thereby precisely regulating the number of particles formed per unit volume and time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If temperature and concentration thresholds are used to control crystalline particle formation, then particle formation can be initiated, but precision and efficiency in regulating the number and size of particles are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle count control precisionVSAvoidcrystallization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from thermal parameters (temperature) to acoustic parameters (power, frequency, duty cycle) to control nucleation. The acoustic parameters provide more precise and responsive control over particle formation kinetics, enabling independent regulation of nucleation rate and crystal growth without the lag inherent in temperature-based methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the thermal field (temperature control) with an acoustic field (ultrasonic energy) to drive nucleation and crystal growth. This substitution enables more precise control because acoustic energy can be rapidly adjusted in power and frequency, providing immediate response to control changes without the thermal inertia that limits temperature-based methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If temperature control methods are used to regulate crystallization, then particle formation can be managed, but the response time is slow and thermal stress is generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle count control stabilityVSAvoidresponse time to control adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces thermal control with acoustic control, where ultrasonic energy directly influences nucleation and crystal growth kinetics. Acoustic parameters can be adjusted instantaneously, providing rapid response time without thermal lag, while eliminating thermal stress that compromises crystal quality and process reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic ultrasonic action through pulsed or continuous wave modes at controlled frequencies. This periodic acoustic energy input creates consistent nucleation events and growth conditions, improving process reliability and predictability while the rapid on/off capability enables quick response to control adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Quantity of substance

If traditional nucleation methods are used, then crystalline particles form at threshold levels, but control over particle count per unit volume and time is imprecise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle count per unit volumeVSAvoidparticle count regulation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the controlling parameters from bulk properties (temperature, concentration) to localized acoustic field properties (power density, frequency, duty cycle). This enables precise regulation of nucleation rate and particle count because acoustic parameters can be independently adjusted and provide immediate feedback response, achieving accurate control over particles per unit volume and time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies localized acoustic energy fields to specific regions of the crystallization system, creating controlled zones of nucleation and growth. This local quality approach allows precise spatial and temporal control over where and how particles form, enabling accurate regulation of particle count density without affecting the entire bulk solution uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If acoustic energy is used to create nucleation sites and control particle growth, then particle formation can be initiated below nucleation thresholds, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational control simplicityVSAvoidacoustic energy system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies ultrasonic transducers that serve multiple functions: creating nucleation sites, controlling particle growth rate, and regulating final particle size. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate control systems for each crystallization stage, simplifying overall operation despite the sophisticated physics involved. The single acoustic field manages the entire crystallization process from nucleation to growth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables precise and repeatable control over crystalline particle formation, allowing for the adjustment of particle count and size, which is faster and more immediate than traditional temperature control methods, and can process large volumes with minimal cross-contamination and thermal stress.

Implementation Method 1

acoustic energy has been used to create nucleation sites in a solution so as to cause crystalline particles to be formed at the nucleation sites

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic cavitation: Acoustic Cavitation

Implementation Method 2

primary nucleation of crystalline particles is caused at a controlled particle count generation rate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNucleation: Nucleation

Implementation Method 3

acoustic energy can be used to influence the rate at which crystalline particles grow in solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic radiation pressure: Acoustic Radiation Pressure

Implementation Method 4

acoustic energy can be used to influence the rate at which crystalline particles grow in solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic vibration: Ultrasonic Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS10549213B2Acoustic energy-based control of particle count in crystallization
Publication Date: 2020.02.04 COVARIS INC
  • US10549213B2 patent drawing
  • US10549213B2 patent drawing
  • US10549213B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for preparing crystalline particle compositions using focused acoustic processing to control a number or count of crystalline particles generated. Peak incident power of focused acoustic energy used to cause primary nucleation kinetics of a solute may be adjusted to adjust the number or count of crystalline particles.